Detailed Information

Cited 19 time in webofscience Cited 19 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Understanding the Model Size Effect on SEM Fit Indices

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorShi, D.-
dc.contributor.authorLee, T.-
dc.contributor.authorMaydeu-Olivares, A.-
dc.date.available2019-03-08T06:57:48Z-
dc.date.issued2019-04-
dc.identifier.issn0013-1644-
dc.identifier.issn1552-3888-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.bwise.kr/cau/handle/2019.sw.cau/3394-
dc.description.abstractThis study investigated the effect the number of observed variables (p) has on three structural equation modeling indices: the comparative fit index (CFI), the Tucker–Lewis index (TLI), and the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA). The behaviors of the population fit indices and their sample estimates were compared under various conditions created by manipulating the number of observed variables, the types of model misspecification, the sample size, and the magnitude of factor loadings. The results showed that the effect of p on the population CFI and TLI depended on the type of specification error, whereas a higher p was associated with lower values of the population RMSEA regardless of the type of model misspecification. In finite samples, all three fit indices tended to yield estimates that suggested a worse fit than their population counterparts, which was more pronounced with a smaller sample size, higher p, and lower factor loading. © 2018, The Author(s) 2018.-
dc.format.extent25-
dc.language영어-
dc.language.isoENG-
dc.publisherSAGE Publications Inc.-
dc.titleUnderstanding the Model Size Effect on SEM Fit Indices-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0013164418783530-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationEducational and Psychological Measurement, v.79, no.2, pp 310 - 334-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.identifier.wosid000461386900005-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85049830095-
dc.citation.endPage334-
dc.citation.number2-
dc.citation.startPage310-
dc.citation.titleEducational and Psychological Measurement-
dc.citation.volume79-
dc.type.docTypeArticle in Press-
dc.publisher.location미국-
dc.subject.keywordAuthormodel size effect-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorstructural equation modeling (SEM)-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorfit indices-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCONFIRMATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSTRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusGOODNESS-OF-FIT-
dc.subject.keywordPlusIMPROPER SOLUTIONS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusMONTE-CARLO-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSTATISTICS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusNUMBER-
dc.subject.keywordPlusTESTS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusINDICATORS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusERROR-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaPsychology-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaMathematics-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryPsychology, Educational-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryMathematics, Interdisciplinary Applications-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryPsychology, Mathematical-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassssci-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Social Sciences > Department of Psychology > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE