Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

A randomized, patient/evaluator-blinded, split-face study to compare the efficacy and safety of polycaprolactone and polynucleotide fillers in the correction of crow's feet: The latest biostimulatory dermal filler for crow's feet

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorJeong, G.J.-
dc.contributor.authorAhn, G.R.-
dc.contributor.authorPark, S.J.-
dc.contributor.authorHong, J.Y.-
dc.contributor.authorKim, B.J.-
dc.date.available2020-04-03T00:55:52Z-
dc.date.issued2020-07-
dc.identifier.issn1473-2130-
dc.identifier.issn1473-2165-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.bwise.kr/cau/handle/2019.sw.cau/37873-
dc.description.abstractBackground: No data on the clinical results and safety profiles of the polycaprolactone (PCL) -based dermal filler for crow's feet correction have been published. Aims: This study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of a novel PCL-based dermal filler, DLMR01, with that of RJR, a purified polynucleotide dermal filler. Patients/Methods: A total of 30 subjects with symmetric crow's feet of 2-4 points on the Crow's Feet Grading Scale (CFGS) were enrolled in this randomized, patient/evaluator-blinded, split-face study. Each subject was randomized to receive injections of DLMR01 or RJR in their right or left crow's feet. At 4 and 12 weeks, all participants were evaluated via CFGS, Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS), and PRIMOS software system. Results: No significant difference in CFGS, GAIS, and Ra value was detected between DLMR01 side and RJR at 12 weeks (improvement rate in CFGS from baseline at week 12—DLMR01: 48.28% [14/29], RJR: 41.38% [12/29]). Conclusion: The novel PCL-based dermal filler DLMR01 shows suitable efficacy and safety, widening the selection possibilities for clinicians and patients in the treatment crow's feet. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.-
dc.format.extent7-
dc.language영어-
dc.language.isoENG-
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltd-
dc.titleA randomized, patient/evaluator-blinded, split-face study to compare the efficacy and safety of polycaprolactone and polynucleotide fillers in the correction of crow's feet: The latest biostimulatory dermal filler for crow's feet-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jocd.13199-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJournal of Cosmetic Dermatology, v.19, no.7, pp 1593 - 1599-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.identifier.wosid000541230800010-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85074789917-
dc.citation.endPage1599-
dc.citation.number7-
dc.citation.startPage1593-
dc.citation.titleJournal of Cosmetic Dermatology-
dc.citation.volume19-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.publisher.location미국-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorbiostimulatory-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorcrow's feet-
dc.subject.keywordAuthordermal filler-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorpolycaprolactone-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorpolynucleotide-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaDermatology-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryDermatology-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > College of Medicine > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Kim, Beom Joon photo

Kim, Beom Joon
의과대학 (의학부(임상-서울))
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE