Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Moth detection from pheromone trap images using deep learning object detectors

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorHong S.-J.-
dc.contributor.authorKim S.-Y.-
dc.contributor.authorKim E.-
dc.contributor.authorLee C.-H.-
dc.contributor.authorLee J.-S.-
dc.contributor.authorLee D.-S.-
dc.contributor.authorBang J.-
dc.contributor.authorKim G.-
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-18T07:15:14Z-
dc.date.available2021-06-18T07:15:14Z-
dc.date.issued2020-05-
dc.identifier.issn2077-0472-
dc.identifier.issn2077-0472-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.bwise.kr/cau/handle/2019.sw.cau/44187-
dc.description.abstractDiverse pheromones and pheromone-based traps, as well as images acquired from insects captured by pheromone-based traps, have been studied and developed to monitor the presence and abundance of pests and to protect plants. The purpose of this study is to construct models that detect three species of pest moths in pheromone trap images using deep learning object detection methods and compare their speed and accuracy. Moth images in pheromone traps were collected for training and evaluation of deep learning detectors. Collected images were then subjected to a labeling process that defines the ground truths of target objects for their box locations and classes. Because there were a few negative objects in the dataset, non-target insects were labeled as unknown class and images of non-target insects were added to the dataset. Moreover, data augmentation methods were applied to the training process, and parameters of detectors that were pre-trained with the COCO dataset were used as initial parameter values. Seven detectors—Faster R-CNN ResNet 101, Faster R-CNN ResNet 50, Faster R-CNN Inception v.2, R-FCN ResNet 101, Retinanet ResNet 50, Retinanet Mobile v.2, and SSD Inception v.2 were trained and evaluated. Faster R-CNN ResNet 101 detector exhibited the highest accuracy (mAP as 90.25), and seven different detector types showed different accuracy and speed. Furthermore, when unexpected insects were included in the collected images, a four-class detector with an unknown class (non-target insect) showed lower detection error than a three-class detector. © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.-
dc.language영어-
dc.language.isoENG-
dc.publisherMDPI AG-
dc.titleMoth detection from pheromone trap images using deep learning object detectors-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/agriculture10050170-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationAgriculture (Switzerland), v.10, no.5-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.identifier.wosid000540851700033-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85086368416-
dc.citation.number5-
dc.citation.titleAgriculture (Switzerland)-
dc.citation.volume10-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.publisher.location스위스-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorDeep learning-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorHorticulture-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorInsect detection-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorMoth-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorPest-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorPheromone trap-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaAgriculture-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryAgronomy-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
ETC > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE