A Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration versus Core Needle Biopsy for Thyroid Nodules: Pain, Tolerability, and Complications
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Jeong, Eun Ji | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chung, Sae Rom | - |
dc.contributor.author | Baek, Jung Hwan | - |
dc.contributor.author | Choi, Young Jun | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Jae Kyun | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Jeong Hyun | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-18T07:43:18Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-06-18T07:43:18Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2018-03 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2093-596X | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2093-5978 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/cau/handle/2019.sw.cau/45319 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background: To compare pain, tolerability, and complications associated with fine needle aspiration (FNA) versus core needle biopsy (CNB). Methods: FNAs were performed using 23-gauge needles and CNBs were performed using 18-gauge double-action spring-activated needles in 100 patients for each procedure. Patients were asked to record a pain score using a 10-cm visual analog scale and procedure tolerability. Complications and number of biopsies were recorded. Results: The median pain scores were similar for the FNA and CNB approaches during and 20 minutes after the biopsy procedures (3.7 vs. 3.6, P=0.454; 0.9 vs. 1.1, P=0.296, respectively). The procedure was tolerable in all 100 FNA patients and in 97 CNB patients (P=0.246). The mean number of biopsies was fewer in the CNB group (1.4 vs. 1.2, P=0.002). By subgroup analysis (staff vs. non-staff), no significant difference was detected in any parameter. There were no major complications in either group, but three patients who underwent CNB had minor complications (P=0.246). Conclusion: FNA and CNB show no significant differences for diagnosing thyroid nodules in terms of pain, tolerability, or complications. | - |
dc.format.extent | 7 | - |
dc.language | 영어 | - |
dc.language.iso | ENG | - |
dc.publisher | KOREAN ENDOCRINE SOC | - |
dc.title | A Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration versus Core Needle Biopsy for Thyroid Nodules: Pain, Tolerability, and Complications | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3803/EnM.2018.33.1.114 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | ENDOCRINOLOGY AND METABOLISM, v.33, no.1, pp 114 - 120 | - |
dc.identifier.kciid | ART002325395 | - |
dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000429405200014 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85044427115 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 120 | - |
dc.citation.number | 1 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 114 | - |
dc.citation.title | ENDOCRINOLOGY AND METABOLISM | - |
dc.citation.volume | 33 | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.publisher.location | 대한민국 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Thyroid nodule | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Biopsy | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | fine-needle | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Biopsy | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | large-core needle | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Safety | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | CONSENSUS STATEMENT | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | KOREAN SOCIETY | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | UNDETERMINED SIGNIFICANCE | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | FOLLICULAR NEOPLASM | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | DIAGNOSTIC SURGERY | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | RECOMMENDATIONS | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | MALIGNANCY | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | RADIOLOGY | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | EXPERIENCE | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | MANAGEMENT | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Endocrinology & Metabolism | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Endocrinology & Metabolism | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | esci | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | kci | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
84, Heukseok-ro, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea (06974)02-820-6194
COPYRIGHT 2019 Chung-Ang University All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.