Preoperative Assessment of Pancreatic Cancer with FDG PET/MR Imaging versus FDG PET/CT Plus Contrast-enhanced Multidetector CT: A Prospective Preliminary Study
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Joo, Ijin | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Jeong Min | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Dong Ho | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Eun Sun | - |
dc.contributor.author | Paeng, Jin Chul | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Soo Jin | - |
dc.contributor.author | Jang, Jin-Young | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Sun-Whe | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ryu, Ji Kon | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Kyoung-Bun | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-03-08T09:39:14Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2017-01 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0033-8419 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1527-1315 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/cau/handle/2019.sw.cau/4986 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose: To determine the diagnostic performance of fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the preoperative assessment of pancreatic cancer in comparison with that of FDG PET/computed tomography (CT) plus contrast materialenhanced multidetector CT. Materials and Methods: This prospective study was approved by the institutional review board; written informed consent was obtained. Thirty-seven patients with 39 pancreatic tumors underwent preoperative FDG PET/MR imaging, PET/CT, and contrast-enhanced multidetector CT. The authors measured maximal and mean standardized uptake values (SUVmax and SUVmean, respectively) of pancreatic cancer at PET/MR imaging and PET/CT. Two radiologists independently reviewed the two imaging sets (set 1, PET/MR imaging; set 2, PET/CT plus multidetector CT) to determine tumor resectability according to a five-point scale, N stage (N0 or N positive), and M stage (M0 or M1). With use of clinical-surgical-pathologic findings as the standard of reference (n = 20), diagnostic performances of the two imaging sets were compared by using the McNemar test. Results: Both SUVmax and SUVmean of pancreatic tumors showed strong correlations between PET/MR imaging and PET/CT (r = 0.897 and 0.890, respectively; P < .001). The diagnostic performance of PET/MR imaging was not significantly different from that of PET/CT plus multidetector CT in the assessment of tumor resectability (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: 0.891 vs 0.776, respectively, for reviewer 1 [P = .109] and 0.859 vs 0.797 for reviewer 2 [P = .561]), N stage (accuracy: 54% [seven of 13 patients] vs 31% [four of 13 patients]; P = .250 for both reviewers), and M stage (accuracy: 94% [16 of 17 patients] vs 88% [15 of 17 patients] for reviewer 1 [P > .999] and 94% [16 of 17 patients] vs 82% [14 of 17 patients] for reviewer 2 [P = .500]). Conclusion: FDG PET/MR imaging showed a diagnostic performance similar to that of PET/CT plus contrast-enhanced multidetector CT in the preoperative evaluation of the resectability and staging of pancreatic tumors. (C) RSNA, 2016 | - |
dc.format.extent | 11 | - |
dc.language | 영어 | - |
dc.language.iso | ENG | - |
dc.publisher | RADIOLOGICAL SOC NORTH AMERICA | - |
dc.title | Preoperative Assessment of Pancreatic Cancer with FDG PET/MR Imaging versus FDG PET/CT Plus Contrast-enhanced Multidetector CT: A Prospective Preliminary Study | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1148/radiol.2016152798 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | RADIOLOGY, v.282, no.1, pp 149 - 159 | - |
dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000395519800017 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85007593308 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 159 | - |
dc.citation.number | 1 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 149 | - |
dc.citation.title | RADIOLOGY | - |
dc.citation.volume | 282 | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.publisher.location | 미국 | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | F-18-FDG PET/CT | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | TIME-INTERVAL | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | METASTASES | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | ADENOCARCINOMA | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | METAANALYSIS | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | MDCT | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | MRI | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | TOMOGRAPHY | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | EXPERIENCE | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | NEOPLASMS | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | sci | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
84, Heukseok-ro, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea (06974)02-820-6194
COPYRIGHT 2019 Chung-Ang University All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.