Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Efficacy and Safety of Rebamipide versus Its New Formulation, AD-203, in Patients with Erosive Gastritis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Control, Noninferiority, Multicenter, Phase 3 Study

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorKim, Gwang Ha-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Hang Lak-
dc.contributor.authorJoo, Moon Kyung-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Hong Jun-
dc.contributor.authorJung, Sung Woo-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Ok-Jae-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Hyungkil-
dc.contributor.authorChun, Hoon Jai-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Soo Teik-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Ji Won-
dc.contributor.authorJeon, Han Ho-
dc.contributor.authorChung, Il-Kwun-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Hyun-Soo-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Dong Ho-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Kyoung-Oh-
dc.contributor.authorLim, Yun Jeong-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Seun-Ja-
dc.contributor.authorCho, Soo-Jeong-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Byung-Wook-
dc.contributor.authorKo, Kwang Hyun-
dc.contributor.authorJeon, Seong Woo-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Jae Gyu-
dc.contributor.authorSung, In-Kyung-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Tae Nyeun-
dc.contributor.authorSung, Jae Kyu-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Jong-Jae-
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-18T07:40:16Z-
dc.date.available2021-10-18T07:40:16Z-
dc.date.issued2021-11-
dc.identifier.issn1976-2283-
dc.identifier.issn2005-1212-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.bwise.kr/cau/handle/2019.sw.cau/50347-
dc.description.abstractBackground/Aims: The mucoprotective drug rebamipide is used to treat gastritis and peptic ulcers. We compared the efficacy of Mucosta (R) (rebamipide 100 mg) and its new formulation, AD-203 (rebamipide 150 mg), in treating erosive gastritis. Methods: This double-blind, active control, noninferiority, multicenter, phase 3 clinical trial randomly assigned 475 patients with endoscopically proven erosive gastritis to two groups: AD-203 twice daily or Mucosta (R) thrice daily for 2 weeks. The intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis included 454 patients (AD-203, n=229; Mucosta (R), n=225), and the per-protocol (PP) analysis included 439 patients (AD-203, n=224; Mucosta (R), n=215). The posttreatment assessments included the primary (erosion im-provement rate) and secondary endpoints (erosion and edema cure rates; improvement rates of red-ness, hemorrhage, and gastrointestinal symptoms). Drug-related adverse events were evaluated. Results: According to the ITT analysis, the erosion improvement rates (posttreatment) in AD-203-treated and Mucosta (R)-treated patients were 39.7% and 43.8%, respectively. According to the PP analysis, the erosion improvement rates (posttreatment) in AD-203-treated and Mucosta (R)- treated patients were 39.3% and 43.7%, respectively. The one-sided 97.5% lower limit for the improvement rate difference between the study groups was -4.01% (95% confidence interval [CI], -13.09% to 5.06%) in the ITT analysis and -4.44% (95% CI, -13.65% to 4.78%) in the PP analysis. The groups did not significantly differ in the secondary endpoints in either analysis. Twenty-four AD-203-treated and 20 Mucosta (R)-treated patients reported adverse events but no serious adverse drug reactions; both groups presented similar adverse event rates. Conclusions: The new formulation of rebamipide 150 mg (AD-203) twice daily was not inferior to rebamipide 100 mg (Mucosta (R)) thrice daily. Both formulations showed a similar efficacy in treat-ing erosive gastritis. (Gut Liver, Published online April 7, 2021)-
dc.format.extent10-
dc.language영어-
dc.language.isoENG-
dc.publisherEDITORIAL OFFICE GUT & LIVER-
dc.titleEfficacy and Safety of Rebamipide versus Its New Formulation, AD-203, in Patients with Erosive Gastritis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Control, Noninferiority, Multicenter, Phase 3 Study-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.5009/gnl20338-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationGUT AND LIVER, v.15, no.6, pp 841 - 850-
dc.identifier.kciidART002776033-
dc.description.isOpenAccessY-
dc.identifier.wosid000703342700001-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85119337237-
dc.citation.endPage850-
dc.citation.number6-
dc.citation.startPage841-
dc.citation.titleGUT AND LIVER-
dc.citation.volume15-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.publisher.location대한민국-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorAdverse drug reaction-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorGastritis-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorIntention-to-treat analysis-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorPhase III clinical trial-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorRebamipide-
dc.subject.keywordPlusHELICOBACTER-PYLORI-
dc.subject.keywordPlusMECHANISMS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusDA-9601-
dc.subject.keywordPlusRISK-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaGastroenterology & Hepatology-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryGastroenterology & Hepatology-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClasskci-
Files in This Item
Appears in
Collections
ETC > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Kim, Jae Gyu photo

Kim, Jae Gyu
의과대학 (의학부(임상-서울))
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE