Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Dupilumab in Adults with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis and Prior Use of Systemic Non-Steroidal Immunosuppressants: Analysis of Four Phase 3 Trials

Authors
Griffiths, Christopherde Bruin-Weller, MarjoleinDeleuran, MetteFargnoli, Maria ConcettaStaumont-Salle, DelphineHong, Chih-HoSanchez-Carazo, JoseFoley, PeterSeo, Seong JunMsihid, JeromeChen, ZhenCyr, Sonya L.Rossi, Ana B.
Issue Date
Aug-2021
Publisher
ADIS INT LTD
Keywords
Atopic dermatitis; Immunosuppressants; Clinical trial; Dupilumab
Citation
DERMATOLOGY AND THERAPY, v.11, no.4, pp 1357 - 1372
Pages
16
Journal Title
DERMATOLOGY AND THERAPY
Volume
11
Number
4
Start Page
1357
End Page
1372
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/cau/handle/2019.sw.cau/51458
DOI
10.1007/s13555-021-00558-0
ISSN
2193-8210
2190-9172
Abstract
Introduction Dupilumab is approved as first-line systemic treatment for adults/adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in Europe and elsewhere owing to its favourable benefit-risk profile. However, systemic non-steroidal immunosuppressants (NSISS) are often used as first-line therapy in clinical practice. Impact of prior therapy with NSISS on dupilumab's treatment effect vs. control has not been described previously. This study assessed dupilumab's efficacy vs. control in patients with moderate-to-severe AD, comparing treatment effect in patients with/without prior systemic NSISS therapy, in four phase 3 trials. Methods This post hoc analysis included 1553 patients randomized to placebo or dupilumab (300 mg q2w) as monotherapy for 16 weeks, or with concomitant topical corticosteroids (TCS) for 16/52 weeks, from four randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials. Patients were stratified by prior use of systemic NSISS and dupilumab-treated patients were analysed against control groups (treated with placebo or placebo + TCS). Results Dupilumab-treated patients, regardless of prior treatment with NSISS, achieved a significantly higher percentage reduction from baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD), Dermatology life Quality Index (DLQI), and Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) vs. control; significantly more achieved EASI score <= 7, Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale <= 4, POEM <= 7, and DLQI <= 5 by week 4. These rapid, significant improvements were seen with or without concomitant TCS and sustained through end-of-treatment. Conclusions Dupilumab treatment (monotherapy or + TCS) provides rapid, significant, sustained improvements in signs, symptoms, and quality of life in patients with moderate-to-severe AD compared with control, regardless of prior systemic NSISS use. [GRAPHICS] Plain Language Summary Atopic dermatitis (AD), also known as eczema, is characterized by red, oozy, and dry skin that can become cracked and infected. Dupilumab is a drug that blocks key molecules that cause allergic conditions, such as AD. It has been shown to be effective in treating moderate-to-severe AD. Other drugs commonly used to treat AD include certain anti-inflammatory drugs, known as non-steroidal immunosuppressants (NSISS), such as cyclosporin. It is not known if patients treated in the past with NSISS get the same results from AD treatment with dupilumab. This analysis used data from four large studies that included patients with moderate-to-severe AD. The objective was to see if prior NSISS use impacted how dupilumab worked to control AD. The researchers looked at a range of measurements-including ones that were assessed by a patient's doctor such as measurements of AD skin lesions. Itching and how patients felt about their overall life quality were also analysed (which included items such as sleep, pain, ability to work or do normal leisure activities, etc.). The researchers found that if a patient had taken an NSISS for AD before taking dupilumab, it had no impact on the efficacy of dupilumab. All of the measurements evaluated improved significantly more in patients treated with dupilumab than in patients taking a placebo (dummy) medication. The benefits of treatment occurred within a few weeks of starting dupilumab treatment and remained until the end of the longest study included in this analysis, 1 year.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > College of Medicine > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE