Efficiency of Port State Control inspection regimes: A comparative study
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Xiao, Yi | - |
dc.contributor.author | Qi, Guanqiu | - |
dc.contributor.author | Jin, Mengjie | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yuen, Kum Fai | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chen, Zhuo | - |
dc.contributor.author | Li, Kevin X. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-11-22T06:40:20Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-11-22T06:40:20Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021-06 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0967-070X | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1879-310X | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/cau/handle/2019.sw.cau/51712 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Port State Control (PSC) guarantees that foreign ships do not jeopardize marine safety, security, and the environment when entering foreign ports. To share inspection information and improve the efficiency of PSC, countries in the same regions cooperate and follow memoranda of understanding (MoUs). Globally, a total of ten MoUs govern three different inspection regimes designed to select and inspect substandard ships. In this study, we use a super-slacks-based measure (super-SBM) to evaluate and compare the inspection efficiency of the three inspection regimes implemented by these ten MoUs and relies on the Malmquist production index (MPI) to identify the most applicable regimes. Our analyses produce three main conclusions. First, we use the average scores of the super-SBM in the past 11 years to confirm the efficiency rankings of the ten MoUs. Second, we combine the average efficiency scores of the three inspection regimes to show that the New Inspection Regime (NIR) is more economically efficient than other inspection regimes. Third, we use MPI scores to obtain a better understanding of the efficiency changes in MoUs? productivity over time and confirm that the NIR is more stable than other inspection regimes. | - |
dc.format.extent | 8 | - |
dc.language | 영어 | - |
dc.language.iso | ENG | - |
dc.publisher | ELSEVIER SCI LTD | - |
dc.title | Efficiency of Port State Control inspection regimes: A comparative study | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.04.003 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | TRANSPORT POLICY, v.106, pp 165 - 172 | - |
dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000646752600006 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85104074109 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 172 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 165 | - |
dc.citation.title | TRANSPORT POLICY | - |
dc.citation.volume | 106 | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.publisher.location | 영국 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Port State Control | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | MoU | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Efficiency | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | New inspection regime | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Super-SBM | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Malmquist production index | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | SLACKS-BASED MEASURE | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | IDENTIFICATION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | DECISION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | CHOICE | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | MODEL | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | FLAG | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Business & Economics | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Transportation | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Economics | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Transportation | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | ssci | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
84, Heukseok-ro, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea (06974)02-820-6194
COPYRIGHT 2019 Chung-Ang University All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.