The effects of SNP genotyping errors on the power of the cochran-armitage linear trend test for case/control association studies
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Ahn, K. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Haynes, C. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, W. | - |
dc.contributor.author | St., Fleur R. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Gordon, D. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Finch, S.J. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-02-20T01:43:52Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-02-20T01:43:52Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2007 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0003-4800 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1469-1809 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/cau/handle/2019.sw.cau/60776 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The questions addressed in this paper are: What single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping errors are most costly, in terms of minimum sample size necessary (MSSN) to maintain constant asymptotic power and significance level, when performing case-control studies of genetic association applying the Cochran-Armitage trend test? And which trend test or χ2 test is more powerful under standard genetic models with genotyping errors? Our strategy is to expand the non-centrality parameter of the asymptotic distribution of the trend test to approximate the MSSN using a Taylor series linear in the genotyping error rates. We apply our strategy to example scenarios that assume recessive, dominant, additive, or over-dominant disease models. The most costly errors are recording the more common homozygote as the less common homozygote, and the more common homozygote as the heterozygote, with MSSN that become indefinitely large as the minor SNP allele frequency approaches zero. Misclassifying the heterozygote as the less common homozygote is costly when using the recessive trend test on data from a recessive model. The χ2 test has power close to, but less than, the optimal trend test and is never dominated over all genetic models studied by any specific trend test. © 2006 The Authors Journal compilation © 2006 University College London. | - |
dc.format.extent | 13 | - |
dc.language | 영어 | - |
dc.language.iso | ENG | - |
dc.title | The effects of SNP genotyping errors on the power of the cochran-armitage linear trend test for case/control association studies | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/j.1469-1809.2006.00318.x | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | Annals of Human Genetics, v.71, no.2, pp 249 - 261 | - |
dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-34047274759 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 261 | - |
dc.citation.number | 2 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 249 | - |
dc.citation.title | Annals of Human Genetics | - |
dc.citation.volume | 71 | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.publisher.location | 미국 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Genotype error | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Methodology | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Misclassification | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
84, Heukseok-ro, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea (06974)02-820-6194
COPYRIGHT 2019 Chung-Ang University All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.