Comparisons of Videolaryngoscopes for Intubation Undergoing General Anesthesia: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
- Authors
- Lee, Juncheol; Cho, Youngsuk; Kim, Wonhee; Choi, Kyu-Sun; Jang, Bo-Hyoung; Shin, Hyungoo; Ahn, Chiwon; Kim, Jae Guk; Na, Min Kyun; Lim, Tae Ho; Kim, Dong Won
- Issue Date
- Mar-2022
- Publisher
- MDPI
- Keywords
- Anesthesia; Intubation; laryngoscopes; Meta-analysis; Systematic review
- Citation
- Journal of Personalized Medicine, v.12, no.3
- Journal Title
- Journal of Personalized Medicine
- Volume
- 12
- Number
- 3
- URI
- https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/cau/handle/2019.sw.cau/61599
- DOI
- 10.3390/jpm12030363
- ISSN
- 2075-4426
2075-4426
- Abstract
- Background: The efficacy and safety of videolaryngoscopes (VLs) for tracheal intubation is still conflicting and changeable according to airway circumstances. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of several VLs in patients undergoing general anesthesia. Methods: Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched until 13 January 2020. The following VLs were evaluated compared to the Macintosh laryngoscope (MCL) by network meta-analysis for randomized controlled trials (RCTs): Airtraq, Airwayscope, C-MAC, C-MAC D-blade (CMD), GlideScope, King Vision, and McGrath. Outcome measures were the success and time (speed) of intubation, glottic view, and sore throat (safety). Results: A total of 9315 patients in 96 RCTs were included. The highest-ranked VLs for first-pass intubation success were CMD (90.6 % in all airway; 92.7% in difficult airway) and King Vision (92% in normal airway). In the rank analysis for secondary outcomes, the following VLs showed the highest efficacy or safety: Airtraq (safety), Airwayscope (speed and view), C-MAC (speed), CMD (safety), and McGrath (view). These VLs, except McGrath, were more effective or safer than MCL in moderate evidence level, whereas there was low certainty of evidence in the intercomparisons of VLs. Conclusions: CMD and King Vision could be relatively successful than MCL and other VLs for tracheal intubation under general anesthesia. The comparisons of intubation success between VLs and MCL showed moderate certainty of evidence level, whereas the intercomparisons of VLs showed low certainty evidence. © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - ETC > 1. Journal Articles
![qrcode](https://api.qrserver.com/v1/create-qr-code/?size=55x55&data=https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/cau/handle/2019.sw.cau/61599)
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.