Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Regulatory and social dynamics of voluntary agreement adoption: The case of voluntary energy efficiency and GHG reduction agreement in South Korea

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorSeok, Jo-Eun-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Junki-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Hyo Seong-
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-08T11:46:15Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-08T11:46:15Z-
dc.date.issued2021-01-
dc.identifier.issn0301-4215-
dc.identifier.issn1873-6777-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.bwise.kr/cau/handle/2019.sw.cau/62623-
dc.description.abstractWhat are the forces that drive increasing adoption of voluntary agreements in the policy field? This paper attempts to answer the question by analyzing the mechanism behind the adoption by 877 entities of the voluntary energy efficiency and GHG reduction agreement (VA) that was in place between 1999 and 2010 in South Korea. We argue that in South Korea's distinct regulatory context, participation in a public voluntary program (PVP), a VA, is a manifestation of participant entities' varied motivations as well as regulatory and social-normative pressures that arise from the institutionalization of the VA program. In addition, aligning the PVP with other policy programs such as eco-labelling program was found to have provided additional incentives for adoption while public ownership, socioeconomic status and environmental management capacity of targeted entities were significant factors. Thus, this study analyzes changes in the motives of participant entities over the course of the program's maturation and demonstrates how government and industries adopt and manage a PVP for policy learning and strategic regulation in the area of energy efficiency management and GHG reduction.-
dc.language영어-
dc.language.isoENG-
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCI LTD-
dc.titleRegulatory and social dynamics of voluntary agreement adoption: The case of voluntary energy efficiency and GHG reduction agreement in South Korea-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111903-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationENERGY POLICY, v.148-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.identifier.wosid000600550600002-
dc.citation.titleENERGY POLICY-
dc.citation.volume148-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.publisher.location영국-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorTiming of voluntary agreement (VA) adoption-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorPublic voluntary program (PVP)-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorRegulatory response-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorInstitutional pressures-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorPolicy learning-
dc.subject.keywordPlusMANAGEMENT-
dc.subject.keywordPlusDIFFUSION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSTANDARDS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusINSTITUTIONS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPERSPECTIVE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusVIEW-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaBusiness & Economics-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaEnergy & Fuels-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaEnvironmental Sciences & Ecology-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryEconomics-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryEnergy & Fuels-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryEnvironmental Sciences-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryEnvironmental Studies-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassssci-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Social Sciences > Department of Public Service > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE