Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

A comparative assessment of SPECO and MOPSA on costing of exergy destruction

Authors
Uysal, CuneytOzen, Dilek NurKurt, HuseyinKwak, Ho Young
Issue Date
Jun-2020
Publisher
INDERSCIENCE ENTERPRISES LTD
Keywords
specific exergy costing; SPECO; modified productive structure analysis; MOPSA; thermoeconomics; exergy destruction; organic Rankine cycle; supercritical cycle
Citation
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EXERGY, v.32, no.1, pp 62 - 81
Pages
20
Journal Title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EXERGY
Volume
32
Number
1
Start Page
62
End Page
81
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/cau/handle/2019.sw.cau/63395
DOI
10.1504/IJEX.2020.107744
ISSN
1742-8297
1742-8300
Abstract
This paper presents the comparison of specific exergy costing (SPECO) and modified productive structure analysis (MOPSA) method to test their abilities on costing of exergy destruction. MOPSA method is applied to a combined supercritical CO(2)regenerative cycle and organic Rankine cycle using zeotropic mixtures for gas turbine waste heat recovery system. The results obtained with applying SPECO method to the system are taken from literature. The exergy destruction cost rate of overall system is obtained to be $86.08/h and $1,113.13/h for MOPSA and SPECO methods, respectively. The exergoeconomic factor of overall system is found to be 31.88% for SPECO method, while this value is found to be 85.82% for MOPSA method. The obtained results with applying MOPSA method for exergy destruction cost rate are significantly lower and more consistent compared to the results obtained by SPECO method.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Engineering > School of Mechanical Engineering > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE