Comparison between DAMA/LIBRA and COSINE-100 in the light of quenching factors
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Ko, Y.J. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Adhikari, G. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Adhikari, P. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Barbosa de Souza, E. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Carlin, N. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Choi, J.J. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Choi, S. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Djamal, M. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ezeribe, A.C. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ha, C. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hahn, I.S. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Jeon, E.J. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Jo, J.H. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kang, W.G. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kauer, M. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, G.S. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, H. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, H.J. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, K.W. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, N.Y. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, S.K. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Y.D. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Y.H. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, E.K. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, H.S. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, J. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, J.Y. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, M.H. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, S.H. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Leonard, D.S. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lynch, W.A. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Manzato, B.B. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Maruyama, R.H. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Neal, R.J. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Olsen, S.L. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Park, B.J. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Park, H.K. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Park, H.S. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Park, K.S. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Pitta, R.L.C. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Prihtiadi, H. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ra, S.J. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Rott, C. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Shin, K.A. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Scarff, A. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Spooner, N.J.C. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Thompson, W.G. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yang, L. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yu, G.H. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-08T14:58:31Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-03-08T14:58:31Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019-11 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1475-7516 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/cau/handle/2019.sw.cau/63711 | - |
dc.description.abstract | There is a long standing debate about whether or not the annual modulation signal reported by the DAMA/LIBRA collaboration is induced by Weakly Interacting Massive Particles (WIMP) in the galaxy's dark matter halo scattering from nuclides in their NaI(Tl) crystal target/detector. This is because regions of WIMP-mass vs. WIMP-nucleon cross-section parameter space that can accommodate the DAMA/LIBRA-phase1 modulation signal in the context of the standard WIMP dark matter galactic halo and isospin-conserving (canonical), spin-independent (SI) WIMP-nucleon interactions have been excluded by many of other dark matter search experiments including COSINE-100, which uses the same NaI(Tl) target/detector material. Moreover, the recently released DAMA/LIBRA-phase2 results are inconsistent with an interpretation as WIMP-nuclide scattering via the canonical SI interaction and prefer, instead, isospin-violating or spin-dependent interactions. Dark matter interpretations of the DAMA/LIBRA signal are sensitive to the NaI(Tl) scintillation efficiency for nuclear recoils, which is characterized by so-called quenching factors (QF), and the QF values used in previous studies differ significantly from recently reported measurements, which may have led to incorrect interpretations of the DAMA/LIBRA signal. In this article, the compatibility of the DAMA/LIBRA and COSINE-100 results, in light of the new QF measurements is examined for different possible types of WIMP-nucleon interactions. The resulting allowed parameter space regions associated with the DAMA/LIBRA signal are explicitly compared with 90% confidence level upper limits from the initial 59.5 day COSINE-100 exposure. With the newly measured QF values, the allowed 3 sigma regions from the DAMA/LIBRA data are still generally excluded by the COSINE-100 data. | - |
dc.language | 영어 | - |
dc.language.iso | ENG | - |
dc.publisher | IOP PUBLISHING LTD | - |
dc.title | Comparison between DAMA/LIBRA and COSINE-100 in the light of quenching factors | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1088/1475-7516/2019/11/008 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS, v.2019, no.11 | - |
dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000507259700005 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85080132765 | - |
dc.citation.number | 11 | - |
dc.citation.title | JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS | - |
dc.citation.volume | 2019 | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.publisher.location | 영국 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | dark matter experiments | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | dark matter theory | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | DARK-MATTER SEARCH | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | ANNUAL MODULATION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | WIMP SEARCH | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | NAI(TL) | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | SCINTILLATOR | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | TEMPERATURE | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | DETECTOR | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | RECOILS | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | SODIUM | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Astronomy & Astrophysics | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Physics | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Astronomy & Astrophysics | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Physics, Particles & Fields | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
84, Heukseok-ro, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea (06974)02-820-6194
COPYRIGHT 2019 Chung-Ang University All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.