Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Case-control Study on Risk Factors of Unplanned Extubation Based on Patient Safety Model in Critically Ill Patients with Mechanical Ventilation

Authors
Kwon, EunOkChoi, KyungSook
Issue Date
Mar-2017
Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
Keywords
endotracheal extubation; intensive care units; patient safety; risk factors
Citation
ASIAN NURSING RESEARCH, v.11, no.1, pp 74 - 78
Pages
5
Journal Title
ASIAN NURSING RESEARCH
Volume
11
Number
1
Start Page
74
End Page
78
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/cau/handle/2019.sw.cau/64048
DOI
10.1016/j.anr.2017.03.004
ISSN
1976-1317
2093-7482
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to identify risk factors of unplanned extubation in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with mechanical ventilation using a patient safety model. Methods: This study was designed to be a case-control study. Data collection sheets, including 29 risk factors of unplanned extubation in mechanically ventilation patients were retrospectively collected based on a patient safety model over 3 years. From 41,207 mechanically ventilated patients, 230 patients were identified to have unplanned extubation during their ICU stay. Based on the characteristics of the cohort of 230 patients who had unplanned extubation, 460 case control comparison groups with planned extubation were selected by matching age, gender and diagnosis. Results: Risk factors of unplanned extubation were categorized as people, technologies, tasks, environmental factors and organizational factors, by five components of the patient safety model. The results showed the risk factors of unplanned extubation as admission route [odds ratio (OR) =1.8], GlasgowComa Scale-motor (OR _ 1.3), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation score (OR _ 1.06), agitation (OR = 9.0), delirium(OR = 11.6), mode of mechanical ventilation (OR = 3.0_4.1) and night shifts (OR = 6.0). The significant differences were found between the unplanned and the planned extubation groups on the number of reintubation (4.3% vs. 79.6%, p < .001), ICU outcome at the time of discharge (x(2) = 50.7, p <.001), and length of stay in the ICU ( 27.0 +/- 33.0 vs. 43.8 +/- 43.5) after unplanned extubation. Conclusion: ICU nurses should be able to recognize the risk factors of unplanned extubation related with the components of the safety model so as to improve patient safety by minimizing the risk for unplanned extubation. (C) 2017 Korean Society of Nursing Science, Published by Elsevier Korea LLC.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
Red Cross College of Nursing > Department of Nursing > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE