Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Bone density measurement in interdental areas with simulated placement of orthodontic miniscrew implants

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Jin-Hugh-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Chang-Hun-
dc.contributor.authorYi, Seung-Won-
dc.contributor.authorLim, Hoi-Jeong-
dc.contributor.authorHwang, Hyeon-Shik-
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-08T23:29:56Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-08T23:29:56Z-
dc.date.issued2009-12-
dc.identifier.issn0889-5406-
dc.identifier.issn1097-6752-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.bwise.kr/cau/handle/2019.sw.cau/65143-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The purposes of this study were to determine bone density at various orthodontic implant sites and compare them according to depth and area (anterior and posterior, buccal and lingual, and maxilla and mandible). Methods: Maxillofacial computed tomography scan data were obtained from 30 adults with normal occlusion. Bone density was recorded in Hounsfield units with simulated placement of miniscrews with the V-Implant program (CyberMed, Seoul, Korea). Bone density was measured to a depth of 6 mm at 1-mm intervals in 60 interdental areas (30 in the maxilla, 30 in the mandible), and mean bone density was calculated at each site. Results: Bone density tended to decrease with increasing depth, particularly in the posterior area. Mean bone density showed a progressive increase from posterior to anterior except for the mandibular buccal side, which had no significant differences. A comparison of the mean bone densities between the buccal and lingual sides in the mandible showed that the lingual side had higher values in the anterior area and vice versa in the posterior area. On the other hand, there were no distinct differences between the buccal and lingual sides in the maxilla. A comparison of the mean bone densities between the maxilla and the mandible showed higher values in the mandible, and these differences were more significant on the buccal side of the posterior. Conclusions: The differences in bone densities according to depth and area should be considered when selecting and placing miniscrew implants for orthodontic anchorage. (Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136:766.e1-766.e12)-
dc.language영어-
dc.language.isoENG-
dc.publisherMOSBY-ELSEVIER-
dc.titleBone density measurement in interdental areas with simulated placement of orthodontic miniscrew implants-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.04.019-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationAMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, v.136, no.6-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.identifier.wosid000272427200012-
dc.citation.number6-
dc.citation.titleAMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS-
dc.citation.volume136-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.publisher.location미국-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCOMPUTERIZED-TOMOGRAPHY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusMINERAL DENSITY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusTRABECULAR BONE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusMINI-IMPLANTS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusANCHORAGE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusOSTEOPOROSIS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSTABILITY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSTRENGTH-
dc.subject.keywordPlusFIXTURES-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSUCCESS-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaDentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryDentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > College of Medicine > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE