A critical review of the US Senate examination report on the 2021 US Capitol riot
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Kim, H. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Julak | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-01-08T21:38:58Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-01-08T21:38:58Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023-02 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1664-1078 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/cau/handle/2019.sw.cau/69570 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The US Capitol riot on January 6, 2021, is currently regarded as an unprecedented armed occupation of the US Capitol that left an irreparable stain on the history of American democracy. Five months later, as part of reflective practice, the US Senate released an examination (review) report on the response failures of federal and local law enforcement agencies, along with corresponding recommendations. This research seeks to critically analyze not only response failures but also recommendations made by the US Senate with a comprehensive theoretical framework incorporating concepts of (1) legitimacy and power, (2) procedural justice, and (3) crowd psychology and the protest policing model. In the end, the research tries to present a practical cooperative dialogue or at least a dialogic approach as a means of strengthening legitimacy based on procedural justice, given that not only European countries but also the Republic of Korea currently operate ‘(Korean and Swedish) Dialogue Police’ and (British) ‘Police Liaison Officer’ in practice. Copyright © 2023 Kim and Lee. | - |
dc.language | 영어 | - |
dc.language.iso | ENG | - |
dc.publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. | - |
dc.title | A critical review of the US Senate examination report on the 2021 US Capitol riot | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1038612 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | Frontiers in Psychology, v.14 | - |
dc.description.isOpenAccess | Y | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000975520800001 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85148340836 | - |
dc.citation.title | Frontiers in Psychology | - |
dc.citation.volume | 14 | - |
dc.type.docType | Review | - |
dc.publisher.location | 스위스 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | dialogic approach | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | dialogue police | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | legitimacy and power | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | negotiated management | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | procedural justice | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | US Capitol riot | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | PROCEDURAL-JUSTICE | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | LEGITIMACY | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | POLICE | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Psychology | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Psychology, Multidisciplinary | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | ssci | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
84, Heukseok-ro, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea (06974)02-820-6194
COPYRIGHT 2019 Chung-Ang University All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.