Flow Diverter Treatment Using a Flow Re-Direction Endoluminal Device for Unruptured Intracranial Vertebral Artery Dissecting Aneurysm: Single-Center Case Series and Technical Considerationsopen access
- Authors
- Suh, Dae Chul; Song, Yunsun; Park, Sang Ik; Kwon, Boseong
- Issue Date
- Jul-2023
- Publisher
- Korean Society of Interventional Neuroradiology
- Keywords
- Dissecting aneurysm; Dissection; Stents; Vertebral artery
- Citation
- Neurointervention, v.18, no.2, pp 114 - 122
- Pages
- 9
- Journal Title
- Neurointervention
- Volume
- 18
- Number
- 2
- Start Page
- 114
- End Page
- 122
- URI
- https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/cau/handle/2019.sw.cau/72050
- DOI
- 10.5469/neuroint.2023.00199
- ISSN
- 2093-9043
2233-6273
- Abstract
- Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and technical considerations of flow diverter (FD) treatment using a Flow Re-direction Endoluminal Device (FRED) for unrup-tured intracranial vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms (VADAs). Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of 23 patients with unrup-tured intracranial VADAs who underwent FD treatment using a FRED between June 2017 and August 2021. Symptoms, imaging findings, treatment strategies, and angiographic and clinical outcomes were evaluated. Dissections were categorized according to the dominance of the VA in which they occurred: dominant VA, co-dominant VA, and non-dominant VA. Results: All patients successfully underwent FD treatment with either a FRED (n=11) or FRED Jr. (n=12). Complete occlusion rates were 78.3% at 6-month follow-up magnetic resonance angiography and 91.3% at 12-month. There were no instances of complications, recurrence, or retreatment during a median follow-up of 20 months. Dissections occurred in the dominant VA in 3 cases (13.0%), the co-dominant VA in 13 cases (56.5%), and the non-dominant VA in 7 cases (30.4%). Intimal flap and true lumen stenosis were observed in 39.1% and 30.4% of cases, respectively. Four cases required a bilateral VA approach due to technical difficulties, all in the non-dominant VA. Conclusion: Flow diversion treatment using a FRED for unruptured intracranial VADAs proved feasible and safe, yielding satisfactory occlusion rates. Technical challenges were more likely in lesions involving non-dominant VAs in the acute or subacute stage, mainly due to associated intraluminal lesions compromising the arterial lumen. © 2023 Korean Society of Interventional Neuroradiology.
- Files in This Item
-
- Appears in
Collections - ETC > 1. Journal Articles
![qrcode](https://api.qrserver.com/v1/create-qr-code/?size=55x55&data=https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/cau/handle/2019.sw.cau/72050)
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.