Pain Relief Scale Is More Highly Correlated with Numerical Rating Scale than with Visual Analogue Scale in Chronic Pain Patients
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Jae Jin | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Mi Kyoung | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Jung Eun | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Hee Zoo | - |
dc.contributor.author | Park, Sang Hoon | - |
dc.contributor.author | Tae, Jong Hyun | - |
dc.contributor.author | Choi, Sang Sik | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-02-23T03:30:28Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-02-23T03:30:28Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2015-03 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1533-3159 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2150-1149 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/cau/handle/2019.sw.cau/72341 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The pain relief scale (PRS) is a method that measures the magnitude of change in pain intensity after treatment. The present study aimed to evaluate the correlation between PRS and changes in pain determined by the visual analogue scale (VAS) and numerical rating scale (NRS), to confirm the evidence supporting the use of PRS. Sixty patients with chronic spinal pain that had a VAS and NRS recorded during an initial examination were enrolled in the study. One week later, the patients received an epidural nerve block, then VAS, NRS, and PRS assessments were performed. Differences between VAS and NRS were compared to the PRS and scatter plots and correlation coefficient were generated. The differences and magnitude of decrease in the VAS and NRS raw data were converted to percentile values, and compared to the PRS. Both VAS and NRS values exhibited strong correlations (> 0.8) with PRS. Further, the differences between the VAS-PRS R (0.859) and NRS-PRS R (0.915) were statistically significant, (P = 0.0259). Compared to PRS, the VAS and NRS percentile scores exhibited higher correlation coefficients than scores based on the raw data differences. Furthermore, even when converted to a percentile, the NRS%-PRS R (0.968) was higher than the VAS%-PRS R (0.904), P = 0.0001. The results indicated that using the PRS together with NRS in pain assessment increased the objectivity of the assessment compared to using only VAS or NRS, and may have offset the limitations of VAS or NRS alone. | - |
dc.language | 영어 | - |
dc.language.iso | ENG | - |
dc.publisher | AM SOC INTERVENTIONAL PAIN PHYSICIANS | - |
dc.title | Pain Relief Scale Is More Highly Correlated with Numerical Rating Scale than with Visual Analogue Scale in Chronic Pain Patients | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | PAIN PHYSICIAN, v.18, no.2, pp E195 - E200 | - |
dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000351560000020 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | E200 | - |
dc.citation.number | 2 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | E195 | - |
dc.citation.title | PAIN PHYSICIAN | - |
dc.citation.volume | 18 | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.publisher.location | 미국 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Pain relief scale | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | numerical rating scale | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | visual analogue scale | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | pain measurement | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | pain intensity measurement | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | pain intensity scale | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | HEALTHY-VOLUNTEERS | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | PALLIATIVE CARE | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | INTENSITY | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | TRIAL | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | TOOLS | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Anesthesiology | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Neurosciences & Neurology | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Anesthesiology | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Clinical Neurology | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
84, Heukseok-ro, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea (06974)02-820-6194
COPYRIGHT 2019 Chung-Ang University All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.