Development of a simulation evaluation tool for assessing nursing students' clinical judgment in caring for children with dehydration
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Shin-Jeong | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Sunghee | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kang, Kyung-Ah | - |
dc.contributor.author | Oh, Jina | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Myung-Nam | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-03-08T13:40:14Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2016-02 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0260-6917 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1532-2793 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/cau/handle/2019.sw.cau/7324 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background: The lack of reliable and valid tools to evaluate learning outcomes during simulations has limited the adoption and progress of simulation-based nursing education. Purposes: This study had two aims: (a) to develop a simulation evaluation tool (SETc-dehydration) to assess students' clinical judgment in caring for children with dehydration based on the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (LCJR) and (b) to examine its reliability and validity. Participants: Undergraduate nursing students from two nursing schools in South Korea participated in this study from March 3 through June 10, 2014. Methods: The SETc-dehydration was developed, and 120 nursing students' clinical judgment was evaluated. Descriptive statistics, Cronbach's alpha, Cohen's kappa coefficient, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were used to analyze the data. Results: A 41-item version of the SETc-dehydration with three subscales was developed. Cohen's kappa (measuring inter-observer reliability) of the sessions ranged from.73 to.95, and Cronbach's alpha was.87. The mean total rating of the SETc-dehydration by the instructors was 1.92 (+/-.25), and the mean scores for the four LCJR dimensions of clinical judgment were as follows: noticing (1.74 +/- .27), interpreting (1.85 +/- .43), responding (2.17 +/- .32), and reflecting (1.79 +/- .35). CFA, which was performed to test construct validity, showed that the four dimensions of the SETc-dehydration was an appropriate framework. Conclusion: The SETc-dehydration provides a means to evaluate clinical judgment in simulation education. Its reliability and validity should be examined further. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. | - |
dc.format.extent | 8 | - |
dc.language | 영어 | - |
dc.language.iso | ENG | - |
dc.publisher | CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE | - |
dc.title | Development of a simulation evaluation tool for assessing nursing students' clinical judgment in caring for children with dehydration | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.nedt.2015.11.011 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, v.37, pp 45 - 52 | - |
dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000371098300009 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-84958171940 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 52 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 45 | - |
dc.citation.title | NURSE EDUCATION TODAY | - |
dc.citation.volume | 37 | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.publisher.location | 스코트랜드 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Clinical judgment | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Dehydration | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Evaluation | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Patient simulation | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Tool | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | VALIDITY | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Education & Educational Research | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Nursing | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Education, Scientific Disciplines | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Nursing | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | ssci | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
84, Heukseok-ro, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea (06974)02-820-6194
COPYRIGHT 2019 Chung-Ang University All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.