Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Defining the degree of intravesical prostatic protrusion in association with bladder outlet obstruction

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorShin, Su Hwan-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Jong Wook-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Jin Wook-
dc.contributor.authorOh, Mi Mi-
dc.contributor.authorMoon, Du Geon-
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-16T05:00:20Z-
dc.date.available2024-05-16T05:00:20Z-
dc.date.issued2013-06-
dc.identifier.issn2005-6745-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.bwise.kr/cau/handle/2019.sw.cau/73671-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The present study was done to define the degree of intravesical prostatic protrusion (IPP) causing bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)/lower urinary tract symptoms. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 239 patients with BPH, analyzing age, IPP, prostate volume, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), and the results from a pressure-flow study. Urethral resistance was quantified by using the BOO index (BOOI), according to the formula BOOI=PdetQmax-2×Qmax (where Pdet is detrusor pressure at the peak flow rate and Qmax is peak flow rate). BOO was defined by a BOOI above 40. Patients with a BOOI below 20 were excluded. Patients were classified into two groups (obstructed and unobstructed groups) by the BOOI. Correlations were determined by logistic regression analysis, and receiver operating characteristic curves were plotted to estimate the optimal cutoff for IPP. Results: There were significant differences in total prostate volume, postvoiding residual urine (PVR), IPP, and Qmax (p<0.001, p<0.001, p<0.001, and p=0.026, respectively) between the obstructed and unobstructed groups, but there were no significant differences in age (p=0.653), IPSS total score (p=0.624), or quality of life score (p=0.138). IPP had a significant prognosis (p<0.001) but was weakly correlated with prostate volume (p=0.026). The correlation coefficients between IPP and Qmax, PVR, prostate volume, and BOO were 0.551, -0.159, 0.225, and 0.391, respectively. For IPP, the area under the curve was 0.759 (95% confidence interval, 0.657 to 0.861) and the cutoff to indicate BOO was 5.5 mm with 66.7% sensitivity and 80.5% specificity. Conclusions: An IPP exceeding 5.5 mm was significantly associated with BOO. © The Korean Urological Association, 2013.-
dc.format.extent4-
dc.language영어-
dc.language.isoENG-
dc.titleDefining the degree of intravesical prostatic protrusion in association with bladder outlet obstruction-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.4111/kju.2013.54.6.369-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationKorean Journal of Urology, v.54, no.6, pp 369 - 372-
dc.identifier.kciidART001776691-
dc.description.isOpenAccessY-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84879138075-
dc.citation.endPage372-
dc.citation.number6-
dc.citation.startPage369-
dc.citation.titleKorean Journal of Urology-
dc.citation.volume54-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorIntravesical prostatic protrusion-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorROC curve-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorUrinary bladder neck obstruction-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClasskci-
Files in This Item
Appears in
Collections
ETC > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Kim, Jin Wook photo

Kim, Jin Wook
의과대학 (의학부(임상-광명))
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE