Outcomes of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography versus primary LCBDE for managing cholecystocholedocholithiasis
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Hanbaro | - |
dc.contributor.author | Shin, Suk Pyo | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hwang, Ji Woong | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Jung Woo | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-06-05T07:30:30Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-06-05T07:30:30Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020-10 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0300-0605 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1473-2300 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/cau/handle/2019.sw.cau/74034 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Objective This study was performed to compare the outcomes of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) versus primary LCBDE for managing cholecystocholedocholithiasis. Methods We retrospectively analyzed data from 59 patients who underwent LCBDE during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for managing cholecystocholedocholithiasis from January 2013 to August 2019. The patients underwent either primary LCBDE plus LC (Group I) or LCBDE plus LC after failed ERCP (Group II). The demographics, reason for ERCP failure, perioperative details, and postoperative outcomes were evaluated. Results CBD stone removal using preoperative ERCP failed in 31 patients (Group II) because of remaining stones after ERCP (n = 9), failed cannulation (n = 6), failed sedation (n = 6), a periampullary diverticulum (n = 5), previous Billroth II gastrectomy (n = 3), a huge stone (n = 1), and an impacted stone (n = 1). The CBD stone clearance rate was >96% in both groups. The mean operative time, hospital stay, overall complication rate, and open conversion rate were not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusions When extraction of CBD stones by ERCP is likely to be difficult or fail, primary LCBDE is an acceptable alternative treatment for managing cholecystocholedocholithiasis. | - |
dc.language | 영어 | - |
dc.language.iso | ENG | - |
dc.publisher | SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD | - |
dc.title | Outcomes of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography versus primary LCBDE for managing cholecystocholedocholithiasis | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/0300060520957560 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, v.48, no.10 | - |
dc.description.isOpenAccess | Y | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000582154200001 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85092779613 | - |
dc.citation.number | 10 | - |
dc.citation.title | JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH | - |
dc.citation.volume | 48 | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.publisher.location | 영국 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Common bile duct stone | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | exploration | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography failure | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | laparoscopic cholecystectomy | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | cholecystocholedocholithiasis | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | stone clearance rate | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | STONES | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | SCALE | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | ERCP | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | DIFFICULTY | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Research & Experimental Medicine | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Pharmacology & Pharmacy | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Medicine, Research & Experimental | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Pharmacology & Pharmacy | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
84, Heukseok-ro, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea (06974)02-820-6194
COPYRIGHT 2019 Chung-Ang University All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.