Midterm outcomes of single port thoracoscopic surgery for major pulmonary resection
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Han, Kook Nam | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Hyun Koo | - |
dc.contributor.author | Choi, Young Ho | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-07-03T01:00:27Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-07-03T01:00:27Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2017-11 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1932-6203 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/cau/handle/2019.sw.cau/74568 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Introduction Single-port thoracoscopic surgery has widened the current minimally invasive surgical techniques toward more less invasive procedures in terms of reducing the number of incisions. However, the current status of oncologic outcome with this technique is not well known for lung cancer surgery. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the oncologic outcomes in early stage lung cancer for impact of the survival outcomes with our experience of conversion to a single-port approach from the conventional three-port approach. Materials and methods Retrospective data of patients who underwent thoracoscopic major lung resection for non-small cell lung cancer between January 2006 and June 2015 were analyzed. Patients characteristics, perioperative outcomes, pathologic result, and postoperative follow-up data of thoracoscopic surgery were reviewed and surgical outcomes were compared between conventional three-port (n = 168), two-port (n = 68), and single-port thoracoscopic surgery (n = 203). Results Of the 203 single-port thoracoscopic surgeries, we performed 167 single-port thoracoscopic lobectomy and mediastinal lymph node dissections. During the learning period of each thoracoscopic approach, the mean operation time for single-port thoracoscopic surgery (189 +/- 62 min) was not significantly different from those of two-port (175 +/- 46 min) and three-port (195 +/- 75 min) thoracoscopic lobectomy (p = 0.165). Perioperative outcomes including drain indwelling time (p <0.001), complication (p = 0.185) and conversion event (p = 0.911) were not worsened during learning period with two-port. Midterm survival (p = 0.753) and recurrence free survival (p = 0.656) of single port thoracoscopic lobectomy showed acceptable results compared with two- and three-port approach. Conclusions Single-port thoracoscopic surgery is safe and a feasible option for major lung resection in lung malignancy and this approach following experiences of two-port approach may yield similar oncologic results to those of conventional multi-port approach during thoracoscopic lobectomy. | - |
dc.language | 영어 | - |
dc.language.iso | ENG | - |
dc.publisher | PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE | - |
dc.title | Midterm outcomes of single port thoracoscopic surgery for major pulmonary resection | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1371/journal.pone.0186857 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | PLOS ONE, v.12, no.11 | - |
dc.description.isOpenAccess | Y | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000415121200008 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85033802850 | - |
dc.citation.number | 11 | - |
dc.citation.title | PLOS ONE | - |
dc.citation.volume | 12 | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.publisher.location | 미국 | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | ASSISTED THORACIC-SURGERY | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | LUNG-CANCER | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | UNIPORTAL VATS | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | LOBECTOMY | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | THORACOTOMY | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | COMPLICATIONS | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | EXPERIENCE | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Science & Technology - Other Topics | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Multidisciplinary Sciences | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
84, Heukseok-ro, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea (06974)02-820-6194
COPYRIGHT 2019 Chung-Ang University All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.