CAU Scholar's Space: Shim, Junseop

Detailed Information

Shim, Junseop (심준섭)

사회과학대학 (공공인재학부)

Research Area: 문화/사회/보건복지정책, 정책평가, 협상론, 의사결정론, 조사방법론

Tel 02-820-5833
Homepage

ResearcherID ORCiD Scopus Google Scholar ID ResearchGate

Keyword

decision making:8||frame analysis:6||판단분석:6||의사결정:5||프레임 분석:5||신뢰:5||프레이밍:4||갈등관리:4||judgment analysis:4||conflict frames:4||semantic network analysis:4||공공갈등:4||frame:4||갈등 프레임:4||public conflict:4||conflict management:3||ADR:3||토픽모델링:3||judgment:3||trust:3||financial regulation:3||프레임:3||혼합방법론:3||framing:3||Judgment Analysis:3||structural equation modeling:3||구조방정식모형:3||판단:3||언어네트워크분석:3||후쿠시마 원전사고:2||방법론적 이슈:2||confirmatory factor analysis:2||topic modeling:2||NIMBY:2||질적 방법:2||원자력 발전소:2||prostatespecific antigen:2||public administration:2||다각화:2||workfamily balance:2||Trust:2||대안적 분쟁해결:2||판단정책:2||participation:2||methodological triangulation:2||JA:2||수용성:2||policy acceptance:2||Conflict Management:2||합의형성:2||정약용:2||문헌검토:2||행정형 ADR:2||갈등조정:2||확증적 요인분석:2||Fukushima nuclear accident:2||금융규제:2||양적 방법:2||Normative decision making:1||Nuclear Power:1||Nuclear Power Plant:1||Nuclear energy policy:1||Organizational Diagnosis:1||PLS Structural Equation Model:1||PLS 구조방정식:1||Panel data analysis:1||Perceived Benefit:1||Perceived Risk:1||Performance of education:1||Policy Acceptance:1||Policy frame:1||Policy science of democracy:1||Qualitative study:1||Quantitative study:1||Randomized Controlled Trials(RCT):1||Roles of Conflict Mediators. ConsensusBuilding:1||SDA:1||SEM:1||Semantic Network Analysis:1||Senior Civil Service:1||Senior Executive Program:1||ShinGori nuclear power plant:1||Social Entrepreneur:1||Social Entrepreneurship:1||Social enterprise dualGoalparadox:1||Social entrepreneurship:1||Social vlaues:1||Structural Equation Model:1||Swing:1||Swing weight method:1||Text network analysis:1||Times Cited:1||Topic Modeling:1||Transdisciplinary approach:1||Transparency:1||Triangulation:1||WTP:1||Willingness to Pay:1||Yakyong:1||acceptance of nuclear power plants:1||acceptance of regulation:1||acute otitis media:1||acute otitis media [nonMESH]:1||agenda setting:1||alternative dispute resolution:1||antibiotics:1||anticipated regret:1||biases:1||bootstrapping:1||budget size:1||career commitment:1||career development:1||career satisfaction:1||checklist:1||chisquare test:1||civillifestandards:1||civilmilitary conflict:1||cognitive control:1||conflict diagnosis:1||conflict management preference:1||conflict resolution:1||consensusbuilding:1||credit union:1||critical assessment:1||decision errors:1||decision frame:1||democratic governance:1||digital literacy:1||discussiontable:1||dual concern model:1||economic performance:1||economic responsibility:1||elderly people:1||electric transmission lines:1||energy system transition:1||evaluation capacity building:1||evaluation capacity management system:1||exploratory factor analysis:1||facility siting:1||false negative.:1||false positive:1||financial cooperatives:1||financial regulators:1||good regulatory governance:1||governance:1||governmental trustworthiness:1||idiographic regression:1||image theory:1||interpersonal conflict management:1||job satisfaction:1||judgment policy:1||linear judgment model:1||local governance:1||location conflict:1||marital satisfaction:1||means compare:1||measure error:1||measurement:1||media agenda:1||media frame:1||mediation:1||medical service:1||methodological issues:1||mixed method:1||mixedmethodology:1||multidimensional scaling:1||multidimensionality:1||mutual trust:1||news frame:1||nonMESH:1||nuclear acceptance determinants:1||nuclear energy acceptance:1||nuclear policy:1||nuclear power:1||nuclear power plant:1||organizational capacity:1||overall evaluation method:1||panel analysis:1||parents:1||participatory decisionmaking:1||patient satisfaction:1||physician decision making:1||planner's triangle:1||policy Acceptance:1||policy agenda:1||policy analysis and evaluation:1||policy conflict:1||policy frame:1||policy onflict:1||power lines:1||practice guidelines:1||pragmatic approach.organizational research:1||problemorientation:1||prostate cancer:1||prostate cancer screening:1||public consultation:1||public health policy:1||public participation:1||qualitative methods:1||qualtative:1||quantitative:1||quantitative and qualitative methods:1||quantitative methods:1||regional characteristics:1||regression analysis:1||regret:1||regulatory agency:1||renewable energy policy:1||renewable energy source:1||renewable portfolio standard:1||representativeness heuristics:1||resampling:1||responsibility:1||risk perception:1||shared decision making:1||simulation:1||social activities:1||social discussion:1||social enterprise:1||social issues:1||social participation:1||social performance:1||social responsibility:1||stakeholder conflict:1||stakeholder decision analysis:1||standard error:1||standardization:1||sustainable development:1||sustainable environmental planning:1||tax burden:1||tax revenue multiplicity:1||text network analysis:1||triangulation:1||trust in government:1||trust in nuclear energy:1||umbrella movement:1||value elicitation method:1||waste:1||waste management:1||weight:1||workrelated Cerebrovascular and Cardiac disease:1||가용성 휴리스틱스:1||가이드:1||가중치:1||가중치 부여:1||가치도출:1||갈등당사자의 프레임:1||갈등의 내재화:1||갈등의 진단:1||갈등해소:1||개별사례적 회귀분석:1||개인간 갈등관리 전략:1||개혁:1||거버넌스:1||거짓긍정:1||거짓부정:1||결혼만족도:1||경력만족:1||경력몰입:1||경력발전:1||경제적 성과:1||경제적 책임성:1||고객리뷰:1||고등교육:1||고위공무원:1||고위정책과정:1||고적제:1||고착과 조정 휴리스틱스:1||공공앱:1||공론조사:1||공론화:1||관리망 이론:1||교육성과:1||교육성과요인:1||교육역량:1||구성주의:1||구조방정식모델링:1||국민행복표준:1||규범적･기술적 의사결정:1||규제 수용성:1||규제거버넌스:1||금융감독규제기관:1||금융감독원:1||금융기관:1||금융위원회:1||기업적 가치:1||기초지방자치단체:1||기후변화 우려:1||기후변화 편익:1||내부통제:1||노인:1||노인 디지털 리터러시:1||뇌심혈관질환:1||뉴스 프레임:1||님비:1||님비 해결방안:1||다산:1||다차원척도법:1||대표성 휴리스틱스:1||대학교육역량:1||대화협의체 형성 동인:1||디지털 리터러시:1||디지털 소외:1||렌즈모델:1||로컬 거버넌스:1||맥락적 접근:1||모바일 앱:1||모의협상:1||무작위통제실험(RCT):1||문제지향적 접근:1||미디어 의제:1||미디어 프레임:1||민관군협의체:1||민군갈등:1||밀양 송전탑 갈등:1||바이어스:1||반복표본추출:1||방법론적 다각화:1||범학문적 접근:1||복합설계:1||부스트래핑:1||분석적계층화:1||불확실성:1||비선호시설:1||비선호시설 입지:1||사회적 가치:1||사회적 기업:1||사회적 기업가:1||사회적 기업가 정신:1||사회적 기업가정신:1||사회적 논의:1||사회적 성과:1||사회적 이슈:1||사회적 책임성:1||사회적판단이론:1||사회활동:1||선형판단모형:1||설계 조건:1||성과관리:1||송전선로 입지:1||수용성 결정요인:1||숙의민주주의:1||숙의민주주의 정책학:1||스윙기법:1||시멘틱 네트워크 분석:1||신고리 5･6호기:1||신고리 5․6호기 공론화:1||신뢰의 다차원성:1||신용카드:1||신재생 에너지:1||신협:1||실증주의:1||양적 방법과 질적 방법의 혼합:1||양적연구:1||언어 네트워크분석:1||에너지 안보 우려:1||에너지 안보 편익:1||에너지 전환체제:1||예방적 갈등관리:1||오차수정:1||외향적 다학문성:1||우산운동:1||원자력:1||원자력 수용성:1||원자력 신뢰:1||원자력 에너지 수용성:1||원자력 정책:1||의료서비스의 선택:1||의사결정 오차:1||의사결정 프레임:1||의사결정분석:1||의제형성:1||이미지 이론:1||이중관심모형:1||이중목표 패러독스:1||인식된 위험:1||인식된 혜택:1||인식프레임:1||인지적 통제력:1||일･가정 양립:1||일가정양립:1||입지갈등:1||장사시설:1||정책 수용성:1||정책분석평가:1||정책실패:1||정책오차:1||정책의제:1||제주 해군기지 갈등:1||조건부 가치측정법:1||조정자의 역할:1||조직역량:1||조직연구의 패러다임:1||조직진단:1||종합적 평가:1||주민 참여:1||지방선택세:1||지방재정:1||지불의사:1||지역 금융 협동조합:1||지역특성:1||직무만족도:1||직장내 성차별:1||진단프레임워크:1||질적연구:1||집단의사결정:1||참여:1||책임성:1||체크리스트:1||측정:1||측정오차:1||탐색적 요인분석:1||텍스트 네트워크 분석:1||투명성:1||패널분석:1||폐기물:1||폐기물 관리:1||폐기물처리시설:1||포용적 행정제도:1||표준오차:1||표준화:1||프레임 변화:1||프레임분석:1||피인용수 분석:1||하수처리시설:1||학문적 위신:1||핵심역량:1||행정학:1||협상과제:1||협상영역:1||협상춤:1||홍콩 시위 갈등:1||환경갈등 ADR 역량:1||환자만족도:1||회귀분석:1||효율적 경계선:1||정책학:1||AHP:1||Academic Reputation:1||Acceptance:1||Administrative ADR:1||Alternative Dispute Resolution:1||Analytic Hierarchy Process:1||Anchoring & Adjustment heuristics:1||Availability heuristics:1||CVM:1||Central Officials Training Institute (COTI):1||Citizen participation:1||Climate change benefit:1||Climate change concern:1||Cognitive Frames:1||Conflict Mediator:1||Contextuality:1||Contingent Valuation method:1||Core Competency:1||Deliberative Democracy:1||Deliberative Polling:1||Deliberative democracy:1||Descriptive decision making:1||Design Conditions:1||Diagnostic Framework:1||Economic values:1||Educational competence:1||Educational performance factors:1||Energy security benefit:1||Energy security concern:1||Environmental Conflict:1||Four Major Rivers Restoration:1||Frame Analysis:1||Frame analysis:1||France:1||Government communication:1||Guide:1||Higher education:1||Higher educational competence:1||Hong Kong protest conflict:1||Inclusive Administrative Institutions:1||Interdisciplinary:1||Internalizing Conflicts:1||Jeju naval base:1||Jinju Public hospital:1||Judgement analysis:1||Jung:1||Lasswell의 ‘민주주의 정책학’:1||Latent Dirichlet Allocation:1||Lens Model:1||Local Government:1||Local finance:1||Local optional tax:1||Mixedmethod:1||Monte Carlo 시뮬레이션:1||MultiMethod:1||NIMBY facilities:1||National ADR System:1||

STATISTICS: Total View :6,928,865; Today View :3,277

RSS_1.0 RSS_2.0 ATOM_1.0

84, Heukseok-ro, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea (06974)02-820-6194

Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.

Detailed Information

Keyword

BROWSE