스포츠시설 이용자의 안전규정 주시특성에 관한 시선추적분석
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 권재윤 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-06-12T06:06:15Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2025-06-12T06:06:15Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2025-04 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1229-358X | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2733-9114 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/erica/handle/2021.sw.erica/125470 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the unconscious processes underlying where and how users perceive safety regulations in sports facilities. Method: A total of 40 undergraduate and graduate students using the fitness center at H University in Gyeonggi Province were randomly selected for this study, which was conducted between May 25 and June 30, 2023. Eye tracking assessments were combined with surveys and interviews to identify gaze behaviors related to normative and general safety regulations. Data analysis included chi-square tests, paired t-tests, and word cloud visualization. The study findings indicated significant differences in the initial gaze fixation areas (text and visuals) when different safety-guideline conditions were presented within one group. Although the difference in fixation frequency in the text area between the normative and general conditions was not statistically significant, fixation time and ratio were statistically significant. Results: In the graphic area, fixation frequency and ratio did not display statistical significance, whereas fixation time did. Moreover, the comprehension time for safety regulations was significantly longer under general conditions compared to normative conditions, resulting in a statistically significant difference. An analysis of word frequency visualized in a word cloud revealed that participants primarily remembered text highlighted in red and color sensations. Finally, unconscious recognition points of safety guidelines revealed that 12.5% of participants perceived the entrance (entrance/exit), 50% perceived the equipment exercise zone, 2.5% perceived the aerobic exercise zone, 35% perceived the inbody and feedback zones, and none remembered the locker room. Conclusion: The findings suggest that the design of safety regulations should incorporate clear textual content alongside visual warning cues. The use of explicit messaging, color coding, and innovative presentation formats may enhance user awareness. These insights advocate for a more strategic approach to safety communication in fitness facilities. | - |
dc.format.extent | 16 | - |
dc.language | 한국어 | - |
dc.language.iso | KOR | - |
dc.publisher | 한국사회체육학회 | - |
dc.title | 스포츠시설 이용자의 안전규정 주시특성에 관한 시선추적분석 | - |
dc.title.alternative | Eye Tracking Analysis of Gaze Characteristics Related to Safety Regulations of Sports Facility Users | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.publisher.location | 대한민국 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.51979/KSSLS.2025.04.100.119 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | 한국사회체육학회지, no.100, pp 119 - 134 | - |
dc.citation.title | 한국사회체육학회지 | - |
dc.citation.number | 100 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 119 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 134 | - |
dc.type.docType | 정기학술지(Article(Perspective Article포함)) | - |
dc.identifier.kciid | ART003202287 | - |
dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | kci | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Safety regulation | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Gaze characteristic | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Sports facility | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | User | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Eye tracking | - |
dc.identifier.url | https://www.dbpia.co.kr/journal/articleDetail?nodeId=NODE12176854 | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
55 Hanyangdeahak-ro, Sangnok-gu, Ansan, Gyeonggi-do, 15588, Korea+82-31-400-4269 sweetbrain@hanyang.ac.kr
COPYRIGHT © 2021 HANYANG UNIVERSITY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.