Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Grasp and index finger reach zone during one-handed smartphone rear interaction: effects of task type, phone width and hand length

Authors
Lee, S.Kyung, G.Lee, J.Moon, S.K.Park, K.J.
Issue Date
Nov-2016
Publisher
Taylor and Francis Ltd.
Keywords
%MVE; index finger interaction; One-handed smartphone interaction; rear interaction
Citation
Ergonomics, v.59, no.11, pp.1462 - 1472
Indexed
SCIE
SSCI
SCOPUS
Journal Title
Ergonomics
Volume
59
Number
11
Start Page
1462
End Page
1472
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/erica/handle/2021.sw.erica/14683
DOI
10.1080/00140139.2016.1146346
ISSN
0014-0139
Abstract
Recently, some smartphones have introduced index finger interaction functions on the rear surface. The current study investigated the effects of task type, phone width, and hand length on grasp, index finger reach zone, discomfort, and muscle activation during such interaction. We considered five interaction tasks (neutral, comfortable, maximum, vertical, and horizontal strokes), two device widths (60 and 90 mm) and three hand lengths. Horizontal (vertical) strokes deviated from the horizontal axis in the range from −10.8° to −13.5° (81.6–88.4°). Maximum strokes appeared to be excessive as these caused 43.8% greater discomfort than did neutral strokes. The 90-mm width also appeared to be excessive as it resulted in 12.3% increased discomfort relative to the 60-mm width. The small-hand group reported 11.9–18.2% higher discomfort ratings, and the percent maximum voluntary exertion of their flexor digitorum superficialis muscle, pertaining to index finger flexion, was also 6.4% higher. These findings should be considered to make smartphone rear interaction more comfortable. Practitioner Summary: Among neutral, comfortable, maximum, horizontal, and vertical index finger strokes on smartphone rear surfaces, maximum vs. neutral strokes caused 43.8% greater discomfort. Horizontal (vertical) strokes deviated from the horizontal (vertical) axis. Discomfort increased by 12.3% with 90-mm- vs. 60-mm-wide devices. Rear interaction regions of five commercialised smartphones should be lowered 20 to 30 mm for more comfortable rear interaction. © 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
Files in This Item
Go to Link
Appears in
Collections
COLLEGE OF COMPUTING > SCHOOL OF MEDIA, CULTURE, AND DESIGN TECHNOLOGY > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Kyung, Gyou hyung photo

Kyung, Gyou hyung
COLLEGE OF COMPUTING (SCHOOL OF MEDIA, CULTURE, AND DESIGN TECHNOLOGY)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE