수생태 독성자료의 정규성 분포 특성 확인을 통해 통계분석 시 분포 특성 적용에 대한 타당성 확인 연구
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 옥승엽 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 문효방 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 나진성 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-22T10:43:19Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-06-22T10:43:19Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019-04 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1738-4087 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2233-8616 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/erica/handle/2021.sw.erica/4162 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives: According to the central limit theorem, the samples in population might be considered to follow normal distribution if a large number of samples are available. Once we assume that toxicity dataset follow normal distribution, we can treat and process data statistically to calculate genus or species mean value with standard deviation. However, little is known and only limited studies are conducted to investigate whether toxicity dataset follows normal distribution or not. Therefore, the purpose of study is to evaluate the generally accepted normality hypothesis of aquatic toxicity dataset Methods: We selected the 8 chemicals, which consist of 4 organic and 4 inorganic chemical compounds considering data availability for the development of species sensitivity distribution. Toxicity data were collected at the US EPA ECOTOX Knowledgebase by simple search with target chemicals. Toxicity data were re-arranged to a proper format based on the endpoint and test duration, where we conducted normality test according to the Shapiro-Wilk test. Also we investigated the degree of normality by simple log transformation of toxicity data Results: Despite of the central limit theorem, only one large dataset (n>25) follow normal distribution out of 25 large dataset. By log transforming, more 7 large dataset show normality. As a result of normality test on small dataset (n<25), log transformation of toxicity value generally increases normality. Both organic and inorganic chemicals show normality growth for 26 species and 30 species, respectively. Those 56 species shows normality growth by log transformation in the taxonomic groups such as amphibian (1), crustacean (21), fish (22), insect (5), rotifer (2), and worm (5). In contrast, mollusca shows normality decrease at 1 species out of 23 that originally show normality. Conclusions: The normality of large toxicity dataset was not always satisfactory to the central limit theorem. Normality of those data could be improved through log transformation. Therefore, care should be taken when using toxicity data to induce, for example, mean value for risk assessment. | - |
dc.format.extent | 11 | - |
dc.language | 한국어 | - |
dc.language.iso | KOR | - |
dc.publisher | 한국환경보건학회 | - |
dc.title | 수생태 독성자료의 정규성 분포 특성 확인을 통해 통계분석 시 분포 특성 적용에 대한 타당성 확인 연구 | - |
dc.title.alternative | The Validation Study of Normality Distribution of Aquatic Toxicity Data for Statistical Analysis | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.publisher.location | 대한민국 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | 한국환경보건학회지, v.45, no.2, pp 192 - 202 | - |
dc.citation.title | 한국환경보건학회지 | - |
dc.citation.volume | 45 | - |
dc.citation.number | 2 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 192 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 202 | - |
dc.identifier.kciid | ART002463097 | - |
dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | kci | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | aquatic toxicity data | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | central limit theorem | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | hazard assessment | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | normal distribution | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | ShapiroWilk test | - |
dc.identifier.url | https://scholar.kyobobook.co.kr/article/detail/4010027127017 | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
55 Hanyangdeahak-ro, Sangnok-gu, Ansan, Gyeonggi-do, 15588, Korea+82-31-400-4269 sweetbrain@hanyang.ac.kr
COPYRIGHT © 2021 HANYANG UNIVERSITY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.