Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Seasonal variation in the community and size structure of nano- and microzooplankton in Gyeonggi Bay, Yellow Sea

Authors
Yang, Eun JinChoi, Joong KiHyun, Jung-Ho
Issue Date
Apr-2008
Publisher
Academic Press
Keywords
size-fractionated phytoplankton; heterotrophic nanoflagellates; ciliates; heterotrophic dinoflagellates; copepod nauplii; nano-and microzooplankton; Yellow Sea
Citation
Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, v.77, no.3, pp.320 - 330
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science
Volume
77
Number
3
Start Page
320
End Page
330
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/erica/handle/2021.sw.erica/42540
DOI
10.1016/j.ecss.2007.09.034
ISSN
0272-7714
Abstract
To investigate the seasonal variation and community structure of nano- and microzooplankton in Gyeonggi Bay of the Yellow Sea, the abundance and carbon biomass of nano- and microzooplankton were evaluated at 10-day intervals from January 1997 to December 1999. Four major groups of nano- and microzooplankton communities were classified: heterotrophic ciliates, heterotrophic dinoflagellates (HDF), heterotrophic nanoflagellates (HNF), and copepod nauplii. The total carbon biomass of nano- and microzooplankton ranged from 10.2 to 169.8 mu g CL-1 and was highest during or after phytoplankton blooms. Nano- and microzooplankton communities were composed of heterotrophic ciliates (7.4-81.4%; average 41.7% of total biomass), HDF (0.1-70.3%; average 26.1% of total biomass), copepod nauplii (1,6-70.6%; average 20.7% of total biomass), and HNF (0.8-59.5%; average 11.5% of total biomass). The relative contribution of individual components in the nano- and microzooplankton communities appeared to differ by seasons. Ciliates accounted for the most major component of nano- and microzooplankton communities, except during summer and phytoplankton blooming seasons, whereas HDF were more dominant during the phytoplankton blooming seasons. The abundance and biomass of nano- and microzooplankton generally followed the seasonal dynamics of phytoplankton. The size and community distribution of nano- and microzooplankton was positively correlated with size-fractionated phytoplankton. The carbon requirement of microzooplankton ranged from 60 to 83% of daily primary production, and was relatively high when phytoplankton biomass was high. Therefore, our result suggests that the seasonal variation in the community and size composition of nano- and microzooplankton appears to be primarily governed by phytoplankton size and concentration as a food source, and their abundance may greatly affect trophic dynamics by controlling the seasonal abundance of phytoplankton. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Files in This Item
Go to Link
Appears in
Collections
COLLEGE OF SCIENCE AND CONVERGENCE TECHNOLOGY > DEPARTMENT OF MARINE SCIENCE AND CONVERGENCE ENGINEERING > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Hyun, Jung Ho photo

Hyun, Jung Ho
COLLEGE OF SCIENCE AND CONVERGENCE TECHNOLOGY (DEPARTMENT OF MARINE SCIENCE AND CONVERGENCE ENGINEERING)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE