Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

텔레비전 광고의 창의성 척도개발과 타당화The Scale Development and Validation of Television Commercials' Creativity

Other Titles
The Scale Development and Validation of Television Commercials' Creativity
Authors
김병희한상필
Issue Date
Apr-2008
Publisher
한국광고학회
Keywords
텔레비전 광고; 광고 창의성; 척도개발; television commercials; advertising creativity; scale development
Citation
광고학연구, v.19, no.2, pp 7 - 42
Pages
36
Indexed
KCI
Journal Title
광고학연구
Volume
19
Number
2
Start Page
7
End Page
42
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/erica/handle/2021.sw.erica/42987
ISSN
1225-0554
Abstract
본 연구에서는 광고주, 광고회사, 소비자 집단을 대상으로 다각적인 접근법을 시도하여 텔레비전 광고의 창의성 측정을 위한 척도개발을 수행하였다. 연구결과, 텔레비전 광고 창의성 측정척도는 5가지 요인의 15개 항목이었으며, 이는 전체 변량의 74.61%를 설명하였다. 최종적으로 제시된 15개 항목의 전체 신뢰도는 Cronbach's  =.8678이었으며, 요인별 신뢰도는 독창성  =.8867, 정교성 α =.8293, 상관성 α =.7689, 조화성 α=.8178, 그리고 적합성 α=.7272이었다. “개성적이다,” “독특하다,” “재미있다”라는 항목은 독창성(originality)으로, “고급스럽다,” “배경이 멋있다,” “세련되다”라는 항목은 정교성(elaboration)으로, “제품(서비스)의 특성을 알았다,” “제품(서비스)의 혜택이 있다,” “내용을 즉각 알았다”라는 항목은 상관성(relevance)으로, “소리가 잘 들린다,” “음향효과가 절묘하다,” “영상과 배경 음악이 어울린다”라는 항목은 조화성(organization)으로, “부자연스럽다*,” “못 만들었다*,” “표현이 제품(서비스)과 어울린다”라는 항목은 적합성(appropriateness)으로 명명되었다(*은 역 항목임). 본 연구에서는 선행 연구에서 간과한 신뢰도를 검증하고 구성개념의 단일차원성은 물론 내용・수렴・판별・공인・예측 타당도를 검증하여 타당한 척도라는 결과를 얻었으므로, 본 연구에서 제시하는 텔레비전 광고의 창의성 척도는 향후 광고 창의성에 관한 이론개발에 기여할 것이다.
This research seeks to develop a measurement scale for estimating the creativity of television commercials with multi-pronged approaches targeting clients, agencies, and consumers. Here are the main results. There were 5 factors and 15 items for assessing the creativity of television commercials according to this measurement scale with a total variance of 74.61%. The total reliability of the final 15 items was α=.8678 using Cronbach’s internal consistency. Individually, α=.8867 for originality, α=.8293 for elaboration, α=.7689 for relevance, and α=.8178 for organization, α=.7272 for appropriateness. After verifying the reliability and validity, the final 15 items were determined-“personality,” “unique,” “interesting” (Originality), “luxurious,” “with splendid background,” “refined” (Elaboration), “understood the characteristics of the product and service,” “have benefit from the product and service,” “found it out promptly”(Relevance), “hear a sound well,” “the sound effects are superb,” “an image matches with the background music” (Organization), and “inappropriate,*” “botched,*” “adequate with product and service.”(Appropriateness). (*is reverse-scored item). This research also checked reliability and unidimensionality and 5 validities; content validity, convergent validity, discriminant validity, concurrent validity, and predictive validity, which were overlooked in previous works. In conclusion, a suggested scale will contribute to the development of creativity theory within advertising.
Files in This Item
Go to Link
Appears in
Collections
COLLEGE OF COMMUNICATION > DEPARTMENT OF ADVERTISING & PUBLIC RELATIONS > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE