Comparison of MDO methods with mathematical examples
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Yi, Sang-il | - |
dc.contributor.author | Shin, Jung-kyu | - |
dc.contributor.author | PARK, GYUNG JIN | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-23T18:40:50Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-06-23T18:40:50Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2008-05 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1615-147X | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1615-1488 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/erica/handle/2021.sw.erica/43072 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Recently, engineering systems are quite large and complicated. The design requirements are fairly complex and it is not easy to satisfy them by considering only one discipline. Therefore, a design methodology that can consider various disciplines is needed. Multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO) is an emerging optimization method that considers a design environment with multiple disciplines. Seven methods have been proposed for MDO. They are Multiple-discipline-feasible (MDF), Individual-discipline-feasible (IDF), All-at-once (AAO), Concurrent subspace optimization (CSSO), Collaborative optimization (CO), Bi-level integrated system synthesis (BLISS), and Multidisciplinary design optimization based on independent subspaces (MDOIS). Through several mathematical examples, the performances of the methods are evaluated and compared. Specific requirements are defined for comparison and new types of mathematical problems are defined based on the requirements. All the methods are coded and the performances of the methods are compared qualitatively and quantitatively. © 2007 Springer-Verlag. | - |
dc.format.extent | 12 | - |
dc.language | 영어 | - |
dc.language.iso | ENG | - |
dc.publisher | Springer Verlag | - |
dc.title | Comparison of MDO methods with mathematical examples | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.publisher.location | 미국 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s00158-007-0150-2 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-41049115175 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000254206600001 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, v.35, no.5, pp 391 - 402 | - |
dc.citation.title | Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization | - |
dc.citation.volume | 35 | - |
dc.citation.number | 5 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 391 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 402 | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Computer Science | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Engineering | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Mechanics | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Engineering, Multidisciplinary | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Mechanics | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | Mathematical models | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | Problem solving | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | Requirements engineering | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | Multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO) | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | Multiple-discipline-feasible (MDF) | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | Multiobjective optimization | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | AAO | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | BLISS | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | CO | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | CSSO | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | IDF | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | MDF | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | MDOIS | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO) | - |
dc.identifier.url | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00158-007-0150-2 | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
55 Hanyangdeahak-ro, Sangnok-gu, Ansan, Gyeonggi-do, 15588, Korea+82-31-400-4269 sweetbrain@hanyang.ac.kr
COPYRIGHT © 2021 HANYANG UNIVERSITY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.