Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

ArF photoresist parameter optimization for mask error enhancement factor reduction

Authors
Lee, Chang HoOh, Hye-Keun
Issue Date
Oct-2005
Publisher
IOP Publishing Ltd
Keywords
MEEF; mask uniformity; ArF; photoresist; optical parameter; sub-80-nm device; solid-C
Citation
Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, v.44, no.10, pp 7404 - 7408
Pages
5
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
Japanese Journal of Applied Physics
Volume
44
Number
10
Start Page
7404
End Page
7408
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/erica/handle/2021.sw.erica/45711
DOI
10.1143/JJAP.44.7404
ISSN
0021-4922
1347-4065
Abstract
The mask error enhancement factor (MEEF) is the best representative index for critical dimension (CD) variation in a wafer which is amplified by real specific mask CD variation. As already clarified in previous reports, MEEF is increased by reducing k(1) (process ability index) or pattern pitch. The illumination system, just like lens aberration or stage defocus effects directly the MEEF value, but the leveling or species of a substrate and the resist performance are also strongly related to the MEEF value. In practice, when engineers set up the photoprocess for fabricating the miniaturized structures of current devices,they established minimum shot uniformity target such as the MEEF value within wafer uniformity and wafer-to-wafer uniformity, in addition to the usable depth of focus (UDOF) or exposure latitude (EL) margin. We examined MEEF reduction by checking the differences in resist parameters and attempted to correlate the results between experiment and simulation. Solid-C was used as the simulation tool. The target node is dense line/space pattern (L/S) of sub-80 nm and we used the same illumination conditions. We calculated MEEF values by comparing with the original mask uniformity using the optical parameters of each resist type. The normalized image log slope (NILS) showed us some points of the saturation value with pupil mesh points and the aberration is not considered. We used four different types of resist and changed resist optical properties (i.e., n, k refractive index; A, B, and C Dill exposure parameters). It is very difficult to measure the kinetic phenomenon, thus we chose the Fickian model in post exposure bake (PEB) and the Weiss model for development. In this paper, we suggest another direction of photoresist improvement by comparing the resist parameters with the MEEF values at different pitches.
Files in This Item
Go to Link
Appears in
Collections
COLLEGE OF SCIENCE AND CONVERGENCE TECHNOLOGY > DEPARTMENT OF APPLIED PHYSICS > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE