ScholarWorks@Hanyang University ERICA Campus: Hove, Thomas Britten

Detailed Information

Hove, Thomas Britten (Thomas Britten Hove)

ERICA 커뮤니케이션&컬처대학 (ERICA 광고홍보학과)

Research Area: 미디어윤리, 미디어와 사회, 헬스 커뮤니케이션, Media ethics, Media sociology, Health communication

Tel 031-400-5442
Homepage

ResearcherID ORCiD Scopus Google Scholar ID ResearchGate

Keyword

SMOKING:4||IMPACT:3||uncertainty:3||KNOWLEDGE:3||COLLEGESTUDENTS:2||INTERVENTIONS:2||MODEL:2||framing:2||Habermas:2||COMMUNICATION:2||Male:2||SUBJECTIVE NORMS:2||Humans:2||health promotion:2||FOCUS THEORY:2||paternalism:2||South Korea:2||Female:2||MASSMEDIA:2||PREVENTION:2||BEHAVIOR:2||CRIME:1||Causerelated PR campaign:1||Child Abuse:1||Child advocacy:1||Civil Dialogue:1||Civil Society:1||Communicative Action:1||Consumer Satisfaction|:1||Culture:1||DECISIONMAKING:1||DEMOCRACY:1||ELECTRONIC CIGARETTES:1||EMOTION:1||ENVIRONMENT:1||EPISTEMIC DIMENSION:1||Engagement:1||Ethical Persuasion:1||Food:1||Food Labeling:1||Government public relations:1||H1N1:1||H1N1 flu:1||HEALTH BELIEF MODEL:1||HEAVYDRINKING:1||Health Promotion:1||INFORMATION:1||INTERNET:1||INTERPERSONALCOMMUNICATION:1||INTERVENTION:1||ISSUE:1||ISSUES:1||Justification:1||LEVEL JUDGMENTS:1||LIBERTARIAN PATERNALISM:1||MARKETING CAMPAIGNS:1||MECHANISMS:1||MEDIA:1||MISPERCEPTIONS:1||MOTIVATIONS:1||MULTISITE RANDOMIZEDTRIAL:1||Mass Media:1||Media Ethics:1||Media Sociology:1||Midwestern United States:1||Moral Controversies:1||NEGLECT:1||NEWS FRAMES:1||NORMATIVE CONDUCT:1||New Media:1||Norm appeal:1||Nutritive Value:1||OBESITY:1||OPINION EXPRESSION:1||PEER INFLUENCE:1||PERCEPTIONS:1||PERSONALIZED NORMATIVE FEEDBACK:1||PERSUASION:1||PERSUASIVE MESSAGES:1||PLANNED BEHAVIOR:1||PROMOTION:1||PSA:1||PUBLICHEALTH:1||PUBLICSERVICE ANNOUNCEMENTS:1||PUBLICS:1||Persuasive Communication:1||Public Relations Ethics:1||Public Sphere:1||Public health:1||QUALITY:1||RELIABILITY:1||Radiation:1||Risk communication:1||Risk/crisis communication:1||Rumor response strategy:1||Rumor type:1||SELF:1||SENSATION VALUE:1||SOCIAL DISTANCE:1||SOCIAL NORMS:1||SOCIAL NORMS CAMPAIGNS:1||SUPPORT:1||Secondhand smoke:1||Situational crisis communication theory:1||Social Warning:1||Social media:1||Students:1||Threat appeal:1||Tobacco:1||United States:1||Universities:1||VERB(TM) CAMPAIGN:1||VIDEOS:1||Virtue Ethics:1||WEB:1||WILLINGNESS:1||Young Adult:1||adolescent smoking:1||advertizing:1||antismoking campaign:1||antismoking campaign:1||autonomy:1||campaign:1||child welfare:1||clinical trial:1||collectivism:1||complacency:1||comprehensive model of information seeking:1||conditional effects:1||conflict resolution:1||consumer:1||consumer choice:1||controlled clinical trial:1||corporate social responsibility (CSR):1||culture:1||descriptive norm:1||determinism:1||differentialimpact hypothesis:1||emotion:1||empowerment:1||entertainment media:1||environmental risk:1||ethics:1||evaluation:1||fear:1||female:1||food packaging:1||framing effects:1||gain:1||government regulation:1||health TV programs:1||health media use:1||health survey:1||human:1||impersonalimpact hypothesis:1||information communication technology (ICT):1||injunctive norm:1||issue attention cycle:1||liberalism:1||loss:1||masks:1||media:1||media advocacy:1||media ethics:1||message appeal:1||message evaluation:1||moderated moderation model:1||negative emotion:1||news framing:1||news media:1||newspaper:1||nonprofit organization:1||nutritional value:1||otherharm:1||perception:1||persuasion ethics schema:1||persuasion knowledge model (PKM):1||pilot study:1||political choice:1||postcolonial theory:1||psychological aspect:1||psychometric paradigm:1||psychometry:1||publicprivate partnership:1||rationality:1||risk perception:1||risk perceptions:1||risk presentation format:1||risk rumors:1||rumor management:1||rumor response strategy:1||secondhand smoke:1||selfharm:1||smoking:1||social ecological model:1||social marketing:1||social media:1||standard:1||student:1||tobacco control:1||tobacco marketing:1||tobaccofree school policy:1||trust:1||trust in government:1||uncertainty presentation format:1||universalism:1||university:1||website monitoring tools:1||가부장주의• 자유주의:1||건강 캠페인:1||공포:1||권한부여:1||금연 캠페인:1||뉴미디어:1||대화 윤리:1||덕 윤리:1||메시지 소구:1||메시지 평가:1||메시지 효과성:1||미디어:1||부정적 감정:1||불확실성:1||설득 윤리 스키마:1||설득윤리:1||옹호:1||위험 제시 형식:1||위험인식:1||윤리설득:1||윤리성:1||자기 상해:1||조건부 효과 모형:1||조절된 조절 모형:1||타인 상해:1||헬스 프로모션:1||홍보윤리:1||3RDPERSON PERCEPTION:1||흡연:1||6 P's:1||ADOLESCENTS:1||ADVERTISEMENTS:1||ADVOCACY:1||APPEALS:1||ATTITUDE:1||Adult:1||Advocacy:1||Agreement:1||Antismoking:1||BINGE DRINKING:1||Behavioral outcome:1||Behaviour modification:1||CARE:1||CESSATION:1||CHALLENGES:1||COMMUNICATIONRESEARCH:1||CONGRUENCY:1||COVERAGE:1||COVID19:1||

RSS_1.0 RSS_2.0 ATOM_1.0

55 Hanyangdeahak-ro, Sangnok-gu, Ansan, Gyeonggi-do, 15588, Korea+82-31-400-4269 sweetbrain@hanyang.ac.kr

Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.

Detailed Information

Keyword

BROWSE