ScholarWorks@Hanyang University ERICA Campus: Paek, Hye Jin

Detailed Information

Paek, Hye Jin (백혜진)

COLLEGE OF COMMUNICATION (DEPARTMENT OF ADVERTISING & PUBLIC RELATIONS)

Research Area

Tel 031-400-5441
Homepage

ResearcherID ORCiD Scopus Google Scholar ID ResearchGate

Keyword

Humans:7||Female:5||human:5||article:4||social marketing:4||BEHAVIOR:4||IMPACT:4||Male:4||위험 인식:4||risk perception:4||Mass Media:4||SMOKING:4||smoking:4||South Korea:3||Internet:3||health promotion:3||OBESITY:3||content analysis:3||female:3||Adult:3||KNOWLEDGE:3||ALCOHOLUSE:3||uncertainty:3||obesity:3||내용분석:3||social ecological model:2||MASSMEDIA:2||수용자 세분화:2||social media:2||Social Marketing:2||ADVERTISEMENTS:2||general theory of crime:2||언론보도:2||stage of change:2||guilt:2||antismoking campaign:2||antismoking policy:2||nutrition:2||위험 제시 형식:2||attitude to health:2||audience segmentation:2||RELIABILITY:2||MODEL:2||PREFERENCES:2||Online communities:2||PREVENTION:2||trust in government:2||TELEVISION COMMERCIALS:2||COLLEGESTUDENTS:2||Risk communication:2||university:2||victimization:2||perception:2||young adults:2||information processing:2||Tobacco Marketing:2||consumer:2||FOCUS THEORY:2||INFORMATION:2||culture:2||공포:2||United States:2||legal aspect:2||PEER INFLUENCES:2||함축적 건강정보:2||Universities:2||PERCEPTIONS:2||금연 캠페인:2||금연정책:2||Middle Aged:2||Videotape Recording:2||뉴스 프레임:2||3RDPERSON PERCEPTION:2||psychometric paradigm:2||담배 마케팅:2||PERSPECTIVE:2||SMCRE:2||publication:2||media advocacy:2||SOCIAL NORMS:2||risk perceptions:2||Young Adult:2||Health Promotion:2||routine activity theory:2||Persuasive Communication:2||rumor response strategy:2||evaluation:2||SUBJECTIVE NORMS:2||Advertising:2||adolescents:2||secondhand smoke:2||Problem gambling:2||fear:2||sense of mastery:2||advertizing:2||ADOLESCENTS:2||framing:2||HEALTH BELIEF MODEL:1||HEALTH CLAIMS:1||HEAVYDRINKING:1||HUTCHINSON SMOKING:1||HYPOTHESIS:1||Health:1||Health Literacy:1||Health communication education:1||Health communication in South Korea:1||Health literacy:1||Healthy eating:1||IMC planning:1||IMMUNIZATION:1||INFLUENZA VACCINATION:1||INJUNCTIVE NORMS:1||INTERNET:1||INTERPERSONALCOMMUNICATION:1||INTERVENTION:1||INTERVENTIONS:1||Imitative Behavior:1||Implicit Health Information:1||Impression management:1||Impulsivity:1||Internet marketing:1||Interpersonal Relations:1||LEVEL JUDGMENTS:1||LIMITEDCAPACITY MODEL:1||Life satisfaction:1||Logistic Models:1||Low Tar Cigarette:1||LowTar:1||MARIJUANA:1||MARKETING CAMPAIGNS:1||MECHANISMS:1||MEDIA:1||MEDIA INFLUENCE:1||MISPERCEPTIONS:1||MOTIVATIONS:1||MULTIDIMENSIONAL HEALTH LOCUS:1||MULTISITE RANDOMIZEDTRIAL:1||Masculinity (MAS) cultural value dimension:1||Media:1||Midwestern United States:1||Models, Theoretical:1||Multimedia campaign:1||NEGLECT:1||NEWS FRAMES:1||NORMATIVE CONDUCT:1||New media platform:1||Norm appeal:1||Normative Influence:1||Nutrition:1||Nutritive Value:1||Online casinos:1||Online groups:1||Online interaction:1||Online networks:1||Onlinegambling communities:1||Ontario:1||Outbreak:1||PEER INFLUENCE:1||PERSONALIZED NORMATIVE FEEDBACK:1||PERSUASION KNOWLEDGE:1||PERSUASIVE MESSAGES:1||PHYSICAL ATTRACTIVENESS:1||PHYSICALACTIVITY:1||PLACEMENT:1||PLANNED BEHAVIOR:1||PLURALISTIC IGNORANCE:1||POLICY:1||PORNOGRAPHY:1||PR award winners:1||PR4 model:1||PR4모델:1||PREDICTORS:1||PRESUMED INFLUENCE:1||PREVENTION PROGRAMS:1||PRIMARY SOCIALIZATION THEORY:1||PROMOTION:1||PR대상 수상작:1||PR효과:1||PR효과 측정:1||PR효과 평가:1||PSA:1||PSAs:1||PUBLICHEALTH:1||PUBLICSERVICE ANNOUNCEMENTS:1||Pathological gambling:1||Perceptions of Reduced Harm:1||Periodicals as Topic:1||Prevalence:1||Product Packaging:1||Psychological Theory:1||Public health:1||Public health campaign:1||Publics:1||QUALITY:1||RATES:1||RESPONSES:1||RISK BEHAVIORS:1||RISP:1||ROLE PORTRAYALS:1||Radiation:1||Review Literature as Topic:1||Risk presentation format:1||Risk rumor:1||Risk/crisis communication:1||Rumor response strategy:1||Rumor type:1||SCALES:1||SELF:1||SENSATION VALUE:1||SENSATIONSEEKING:1||SEX:1||SMOKINGBEHAVIOR:1||SOCIAL DISTANCE:1||SOCIAL NORMS CAMPAIGNS:1||SPOKESPERSON:1||School intervention:1||Secondhand smoke:1||Self Efficacy:1||Situational crisis communication theory:1||Social Environment:1||Social Media:1||Social ecological model:1||Social identity:1||Social marketing:1||Social media:1||Social network sites:1||Social norms:1||Socioeconomic Factors:1||Strategic risk communication:1||Students:1||TOBACCO USE:1||Textbooks as Topic:1||Threat appeal:1||Tobacco:1||Tobacco Industry:1||Twitter:1||UNITEDSTATES:1||USA:1||United States of America:1||VERB(TM) CAMPAIGN:1||VIDEOS:1||WEB:1||WOMENS MAGAZINE:1||Warning Label:1||Worldwide web:1||YOUNGCHILDREN UNDERSTAND:1||YOUTH:1||Youth:1||absolute risk:1||adolescent:1||adolescent smoking:1||advertising:1||advertising appeals:1||affect heuristic:1||alcohol use disorder:1||anchoring heuristic:1||and sponsorships (TAPS):1||antismoking campaign:1||antismoking ad:1||attribution:1||behavioral component:1||book:1||campaign:1||carcinogenic hazard:1||chil:1||child welfare:1||children:1||clinical trial:1||collectivism:1||comments:1||communitybased participatory research:1||comprehensive model of information seeking:1||conditional effects:1||conditional process model:1||consumer health information:1||controlled clinical trial:1||corporate social responsibility (CSR):1||curriculum:1||cyberaggression:1||cybercrime:1||cyberharassment:1||descriptive norm:1||diet:1||differential impact hypothesis:1||differentialimpact hypothesis:1||discrimination:1||earthquake:1||emotion:1||empowerment:1||entertainment media:1||environmental risk:1||ethics:1||excessive gambling:1||exercise:1||external cue:1||family planning:1||female|:1||fine dust:1||food packaging:1||framing effects:1||functional matching:1||gain:1||gender norm:1||genetically modified organism:1||health TV programs:1||health belief model:1||health campaign:1||health consciousness:1||health education:1||health literacy:1||health media use:1||health survey:1||healthspecific TV:1||healthy corner store program:1||heuristicsystematic model:1||hierarchical linear modeling:1||human relation:1||identity bubble involvement:1||imitation:1||impersonal impact hypothesis:1||impersonalimpact hypothesis:1||impulsivity:1||information avoidance:1||information seeking:1||injunctive norm:1||integrative model:1||intention for preventive action:1||intention to use application (app):1||internal cue:1||interpersonal communication:1||issue attention cycle:1||liberalism:1||literature:1||loneliness:1||longitudinal research:1||longitudinal study:1||loss:1||matchup hypothesis:1||measurement:1||media:1||media coverage:1||media credibility:1||media exposure:1||media framing:1||medical education:1||medical information:1||mental illness:1||message appeal:1||message evaluation:1||message strategy:1||methodology:1||middle aged:1||minority health:1||mobile application:1||moderated moderation model:1||negative emotion:1||news coverage:1||news frame:1||news frames:1||news framing:1||news media:1||newspaper:1||nonprofit organization:1||norm appeals:1||numeracy:1||nutritional value:1||offset responsibility:1||online news:1||online relationships:1||onset responsibility:1||otherharm:1||outcome:1||output:1||outtake:1||overweight:1||packaging:1||paternalism:1||perceived easiness:1||perceived effectiveness:1||perceived enjoyment:1||perceived evaluation of action:1||perceived threat:1||perceived usefulness:1||personallevel risk perception:1||persuasion ethics schema:1||persuasion knowledge model (PKM):1||persuasive communication:1||pilot study:1||prejudice:1||prevalence:1||preventive behavioral intention:1||preventive health behavior:1||problem gambling:1||promotion:1||promotion management:1||promotion techniques:1||psychological aspect:1||psychological distress:1||psychological theory:1||psychometry:1||public relations effectiveness:1||purchase experience:1||purchase impulsivity:1||relative risk:1||risk characteristics:1||risk communication:1||risk presentation format:1||risk rumors:1||rumor management:1||school intervention:1||school interventions:1||screen time:1||secondhand smoke:1||sedentary:1||self concept:1||selfharm:1||sex difference:1||sleep:1||social capital:1||social distance corollary:1||social environment:1||social media interaction:1||social norms:1||societallevel risk perception:1||socioeconomics:1||source credibility:1||standard:1||statistical model:1||stigma:1||student:1||target corollary:1||television:1||television viewing:1||temporal distance:1||theoretical model:1||thirdperson perception:1||threat appeal:1||tobacco:1||tobacco advertising:1||tobacco control:1||tobacco marketing:1||tobacco tax:1||tobaccofree school policy:1||trust:1||tuberculosis:1||twoway communication:1||uncertainty presentation format:1||underserved populations:1||videorecording|:1||website monitoring tools:1||willingness to comply to the government’ recommendations:1||youth:1||가부장주의• 자유주의:1||가향:1||개인적 위험인식:1||건강 관심도:1||건강 캠페인:1||건강 프로그램:1||경고문:1||광고 소구:1||광고성 콘텐츠:1||국민보건 캠페인:1||권한부여:1||귀인:1||낙인:1||뉴미디어 플랫폼:1||담배 광고:1||담배 포장 마케팅 커뮤니케이션:1||담배가격 인상정책:1||담뱃갑:1||댓글:1||디자인:1||루머 대응 전략:1||메시지 소구:1||메시지 평가:1||메시지 효과성:1||메시지전략:1||미디어:1||미디어 노출:1||미디어 옹호:1||미디어 프레이밍:1||미세먼지:1||미세먼지 어플리케이션:1||발암물질:1||변화단계 모형:1||변화단계모델:1||보건/건강정보 이해능력:1||부정적 감정:1||불확실성:1||비개인적 영향 가설:1||사회생태학적 모델:1||사회적 거리 결과:1||사회적 위험 인식:1||상대적 위험:1||색깔:1||설득 윤리 스키마:1||설득윤리:1||소셜미디어:1||수리 문해력:1||시간적 거리:1||심리측정 접근:1||쌍방향 커뮤니케이션:1||알코올 사용장애:1||앱 사용 의도:1||언론 신뢰도:1||예방 의도:1||예방 행동 의도:1||온라인 뉴스:1||용이성:1||원인 책임:1||위기대응커뮤니케이션:1||위험 루머:1||위험 커뮤니케이션:1||위험 특성:1||위험인식:1||위험정보 탐색처리 모형:1||위협 소구:1||유용성:1||윤리성:1||음주운전 예방 • 공익광고 • 메시지 지향성 • 위험제시형식 • 공포감 • 죄책감:1||자기 상해:1||저위험 인식:1||저타르:1||저타르 담배:1||전자 담배:1||절대적 위험:1||정보 추구:1||정보 회피:1||정보원 신뢰도:1||정부 권고 순응 의도:1||정부 신뢰도:1||정신질환:1||제3자 지각:1||조건부 효과 모형:1||조건적 과정 모형:1||조절된 조절 모형:1||즐거움:1||지각된 효과성:1||지진:1||지진 위험:1||차별:1||차별적 영향 가설:1||타깃 결과:1||타인 상해:1||통합적 모델:1||트위터:1||편견:1||한국 헬스커뮤니케이션:1||해결 책임:1||행동적 요소:1||헬스 프로모션:1||헬스리터러시:1||헬스커뮤니케이션 교육:1||확산 특성:1||휴리스틱:1||흡연:1||ADOLESCENT SMOKING:1||ADULTS:1||ADVERGAMES:1||APPEALS:1||ATTENTION:1||ATTITUDE:1||ATTITUDES:1||Adolescent:1||Adolescents:1||Advertising Appeal:1||Advertising media:1||Age Factors:1||Antismoking campaigns:1||Antismoking:1||Asia:1||Attitude change:1||BELIEF MODEL:1||BINGE DRINKING:1||BRAND ATTITUDE:1||Behavioral outcome:1||Behaviour modification:1||CELEBRITY ENDORSER:1||CENSORSHIP:1||CESSATION:1||CHILDHOOD OBESITY:1||CHINESE:1||CIGARETTE:1||CIGARETTESMOKING:1||COMMUNICATION:1||COMMUNICATIONRESEARCH:1||CONGRUENCY:1||CONSEQUENCES:1||CONSUMERS:1||CONSUMPTION:1||COVERAGE:1||CRIME:1||CULTURALVALUES:1||Canada:1||Cause sponsorship:1||Causerelated PR campaign:1||Causerelated marketing:1||Child:1||Child Abuse:1||Child advocacy:1||Children:1||Cigarette Advertising:1||Cigarette Package Marketing Communication:1||Cigarettes:1||Color:1||Commercial Contents:1||Communitybased health promotion:1||Consumer Satisfaction|:1||Consumer debt:1||Content Analysis:1||Content analysis:1||Cooperative Behavior:1||Corporate social responsibility:1||Crisis Communication:1||Crisis communication:1||Crosscultural research:1||Crosscultural studies:1||Crossnational study:1||Culture:1||Curriculum:1||DESCRIPTIVE NORMS:1||DRINKING:1||DRUGUSE:1||Data Collection:1||Design:1||Diet:1||Diffusion Characteristics:1||Disaster Planning:1||Drunk Driving Prevention • Public Service Advertising • Message Orientation • Risk Presentation Format • Fear • Guilt:1||Ecigarette:1||ELECTRONIC CIGARETTES:1||EMOTION:1||ENVIRONMENT:1||Earthquake risks:1||Emerging adults:1||Engagement:1||Entertainmenteducation:1||Ethiopia:1||Evaluation:1||FCB grid:1||FOLLOWUP:1||Family planning:1||Fellowships and Scholarships:1||Fetishism (Psychiatric):1||Flavor:1||Food:1||Food Labeling:1||Genderrelated Development Index (GDI):1||Genderrole portrayals:1||Government public relations:1||H1N1:1||H1N1 flu:1||

STATISTICS: Total View :2,244,679; Today View :447

RSS_1.0 RSS_2.0 ATOM_1.0

55 Hanyangdeahak-ro, Sangnok-gu, Ansan, Gyeonggi-do, 15588, Korea+82-31-400-4269

Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.

Detailed Information

Keyword

BROWSE