Detailed Information

Cited 36 time in webofscience Cited 38 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Comparison of two different S-1 plus cisplatin dosing schedules as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic and/or recurrent gastric cancer: a multicenter, randomized phase III trial (SOS)

Authors
Ryu, M. -H.Baba, E.Lee, K. H.Park, Y. I.Boku, N.Hyodo, I.Nam, B. -H.Esaki, T.Yoo, C.Ryoo, B. -Y.Song, E. -K.Cho, S. -H.Kang, W. K.Yang, S. H.Zang, D. Y.Shin, D. B.Park, S. R.Shinozaki, K.Takano, T.Kang, Y. -K.
Issue Date
Oct-2015
Publisher
OXFORD UNIV PRESS
Keywords
gastric cancer; S-1; cisplatin; chemotherapy
Citation
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, v.26, no.10, pp.2097 - 2101
Journal Title
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
Volume
26
Number
10
Start Page
2097
End Page
2101
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/gachon/handle/2020.sw.gachon/10084
DOI
10.1093/annonc/mdv316
ISSN
0923-7534
Abstract
Background: Five-weekly S-1 plus cisplatin (SP5) is one of the standard first-line regimens for advanced gastric cancer (GC), proven in a Japanese phase III study. To enhance the dose intensity of cisplatin, 3-weekly S-1 plus cisplatin (SP3) was developed. Patients and methods: This multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase III study evaluated whether SP3 (S-1 80 mg/m(2)/day on days 1-14 and cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) on day 1) was noninferior/superior to SP5 (S-1 80-120 mg/day on days 1-21 and cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) on day 1 or 8) in terms of progression-free survival (PFS). Chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic, recurrent gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma were randomized 1 : 1 to receive either SP3 or SP5. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00915382). Results: Between February 2009 and January 2012, 625 patients were randomized at 42 sites in Korea and Japan. With a median follow-up duration of 32.4 months (range, 13.3-48.6 months) in surviving patients, SP3 was not only noninferior but also superior to SP5 in terms of PFS [median 5.5 versus 4.9 months; hazard ratio (HR) = 0.82; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68-0.99; P = 0.0418 for superiority). There was no difference in overall survival (OS) between the groups (median 14.1 versus 13.9 months; HR = 0.99; 95% CI 0.81-1.21; P = 0.9068). In patients with measurable disease, the response rates were 60% in the SP3 arm and 50% in the SP5 arm (P = 0.065). Both regimens were generally well tolerated, but grade 3 or higher anemia (19% versus 9%) and neutropenia (39% versus 9%) were more frequent in SP3. Conclusions: SP3 is superior to SP5 in terms of PFS. However, since the improvement in PFS was only slight and there was no difference in OS, both SP3 and SP5 can be recommended as first-line treatments for patients with advanced GC.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
ETC > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE