Detailed Information

Cited 12 time in webofscience Cited 12 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Multicenter analysis of treatment outcomes in adult patients with lymphoblastic lymphoma who received hyper-CVAD induction followed by hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Authors
Jeong, Seong HyunMoon, Joon HoKim, Jin SeokYang, Deok-HwanPark, YongCho, Seok GooKwak, Jae-YongEom, Hyeon SeokWon, Jong HoHong, Jun ShikOh, Sung YongLee, Ho SupKim, Seok Jin
Issue Date
Apr-2015
Publisher
SPRINGER
Keywords
Lymphoblastic lymphoma; Hyper-CVAD; Stem cell transplantation
Citation
ANNALS OF HEMATOLOGY, v.94, no.4, pp.617 - 625
Journal Title
ANNALS OF HEMATOLOGY
Volume
94
Number
4
Start Page
617
End Page
625
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/gachon/handle/2020.sw.gachon/10638
DOI
10.1007/s00277-014-2258-y
ISSN
0939-5555
Abstract
The hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (hyper-CVAD) regimen has been widely used for lymphoblastic lymphoma (LBL) as a primary treatment. However, there is few data about its treatment outcome in Asian patients. Thus, we conducted this study to evaluate the efficacy of hyper-CVAD induction and stem cell transplantation (SCT) consolidation in LBL patients. The treatment responses of 49 patients treated with the hyper-CVAD regimen were retrospectively analyzed in 13 institutions. Given 24 patients who responded to hyper-CVAD underwent consolidation treatment with SCT, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of patients who received SCT were compared with patients who did not. The overall response rate was 79 %: 73 % (36/49) complete responses, 6 % (3/49) partial responses, and 4 % (2/49) induction deaths. The major limitation for the delivery of the planned hyper-CVAD cycles was hematological toxicity. Among 39 responders, 24 patients underwent autologous (n = 16) and allogeneic SCT (n = 8) consolidation. Their 3-year OS and PFS rates were 76 and 78 %, respectively, and there was no difference in survival outcomes between autologous and allogeneic SCT. However, 15 patients without SCT consolidation showed poorer PFS even though they all achieved complete response. Thus, only seven patients maintained their response at the time of analysis. In conclusion, the hyper-CVAD regimen is effective for remission induction in LBL, and SCT consolidation after hyper-CVAD induction produced better clinical outcomes than did continuation of hyper-CVAD.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
ETC > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE