한약을 사용하는 아시아권 국가의 유해사례 보고 양식에 관한 비교 연구

Abstract

Objective : The purpose of this study is to find out the possibility of application to herbal medicine’s report form for adverse drug reaction (ADR) by reviewing and analyzing Asian countries’s ADR report forms. Method : We investigated, compared, and analyzed ADR report forms (ADR-RF) of Asian countries’s ADR institutions (ACAI), such as, Korea institute of drug safety & risk management and Dongguk university Ilsan oriental hospital (DUIOH) in Korea, national center for ADR monintoring (NCAM) in China, pharmaceuticals and medical devices agency (PMDA) in Japan, Ministry of Health and Welfare (MOHW) in Taiwan, and drug office, department of health, the government of the Hong Kong special administrative region (GHKSAR) in Hong Kong. Results : ADR-RF for ACAI included common contents, such as, patients information (name(initial), gender, age, weight), adverse event (AE)’s report information (Recognition and report for AE occurrence, first or follow up report, Severe AE), the detailed information of AE (the title of AE, onset & closing date of AE symptoms, the progress & results detailed test of AE), the information of AE’s medicine (the types of medicine, product name, ingredient name, suspected or combination drug, single dose & frequency, dosage form, administration route, dealing for AE-suspected medicine), and AE reporter's information (reporter’s information, institution’s information). Taiwan had ADR-RF and the department exclusively for herbal medicine (HM), but others (except DUIOH) had not only no ADR report form but also contents for HM. Conclusion : ADR-RF for HM have to include the common contents of ACAI at least, as well as HM information related to ADR, such as the title, composition and types of HM, history related to HM’s ADR, and the contents of drug-induced liver injury and so on. In addition, the main department of government for HM’s ADR will be needed.