TRIZ 인과관계 모순트리와 통합원리를 이용한 물리적 모순의 창의적 해결방안의 고찰 및 적용방안Review and Application of Creative Problem-Solving Processes for Technical and Physical Contradictions Using Cause-And-Effect Contradiction Tree and Integrated Principles of TRIZ
- Other Titles
- Review and Application of Creative Problem-Solving Processes for Technical and Physical Contradictions Using Cause-And-Effect Contradiction Tree and Integrated Principles of TRIZ
- Authors
- 최성운
- Issue Date
- Jun-2015
- Publisher
- 대한안전경영과학회
- Keywords
- TRIZ; Physical Contradiction; Technical Contradiction; IFR; Ends Means; Causal Relationship; CAED; LT; TPCT; TCD; Integrated Principles; Case Studies
- Citation
- 대한안전경영과학회지, v.17, no.2, pp.215 - 228
- Journal Title
- 대한안전경영과학회지
- Volume
- 17
- Number
- 2
- Start Page
- 215
- End Page
- 228
- URI
- https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/gachon/handle/2020.sw.gachon/11548
- DOI
- 10.12812/ksms.2015.17.2.215
- ISSN
- 1229-6783
- Abstract
- A creative innovation and an innovative problem-solving of industrial companies can be achieved by overcoming the challenges of technical and physical contradictions. The approaches to address conflicting and paradoxical problems, such as technical and physical contradictions have a crucial role in advancing the quality assessment for manufacturer and service provider. The term, technical contradiction, depicts the state that improvement of one ends of IFR (Ideal Final Result) leads to unfavorable condition of the other ends, and results in conflicting problem. Another type of contradictions that’s discussed in this study is a physical contradiction which is due to two mutually opposing states of the means of ends, and gives paradoxical situation.
By integrating the means-ends chain perspectives, the physical contradiction that is a specifically root-causes, “means”, can be initially addressed to resolve the downstream problem of technical contradiction which represents a general and abstract goals, “ends”. This research suggests IFR resolution processes to handle both physical contradiction of means and technical contradiction of ends by employing causal relationship with IFR, effects and causes.
In summary, the study represents three major processes that resolve such contradictions are demonstrated as follows: 1) Derivation of causal and hierarchical relationship among IFR, ends and means by considering CAED (Cause-And-Effect Diagram) and LT (Logic Tree). 2) Identification of causal relationship between physical contradiction and technical contradiction by using TPCT (TRIZ Physical Contradiction Tree) and TCD (Technical Contradiction Diagram). 3) Application of integrated TRIZ principles by classifying 40 inventive principles into 4 general conditions of the separation principle of mutually opposite states in space, in time, based on conditions, and between the parts and the whole. In order to validate the proof of proposed IFR resolution processes, the analysis of the TRIZ case studies from National Quality Circle Contest in the years, 2011 to 2014 have been proposed. The suggested guidelines that are built based on TRIZ principles can uniquely enhance the process of quality innovation and assessment for quality practitioners.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - 공과대학 > 산업경영공학과 > 1. Journal Articles
![qrcode](https://api.qrserver.com/v1/create-qr-code/?size=55x55&data=https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/gachon/handle/2020.sw.gachon/11548)
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.