Detailed Information

Cited 16 time in webofscience Cited 18 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Ultrasound-guided selective nerve root block versus fluoroscopy-guided interlaminar epidural block for the treatment of radicular pain in the lower cervical spine: a retrospective comparative study

Authors
Park, Ki DeokLee, Woo YongNam, Sang HyunKim, MyounghwanPark, Yongbum
Issue Date
Jun-2019
Publisher
SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG
Keywords
Ultrasound; Fluoroscopy; Injection; Cervical
Citation
JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND, v.22, no.2, pp.167 - 177
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND
Volume
22
Number
2
Start Page
167
End Page
177
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/gachon/handle/2020.sw.gachon/1395
DOI
10.1007/s40477-018-0344-z
ISSN
1971-3495
Abstract
PurposeRecent studies have compared the therapeutic efficacy and safety of the procedure using ultrasound and fluoroscopy. However, there are no published studies comparing the therapeutic efficacy and safety of fluoroscopy (FL)-guided cervical interlaminar epidural steroid injection (CIESI) with that of ultrasound (US)-guided selective nerve root block (SNRB). This study aimed to compare the mid-term effects and advantages of US-guided SNRB with FL-guided CIESI for radicular pain in the lower cervical spine through assessment of pain relief and functional improvement.MethodsPatients with radicular pain in the lower cervical spine who received US-guided SNRB (n=51) or FL-guided CIESI (n=61) were included in this retrospective study. All procedures were performed using FL or US. The complication frequencies during the procedures, adverse events, treatment effects, and functional improvement were compared at intervals of 1, 3, and 6months after the last injection.ResultsBoth the neck disability index and verbal numeric scale showed improvements at 1, 3, and 6months after the last injection in both groups, with no significant differences between groups (p<0.05). Furthermore, the treatment success rate at all time points was not significantly different between groups. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the injection method (US- or FL-guided), sex, analgesic use, pain duration, number of injections, and age were not independent predictors of treatment success. Blood was aspirated before injection in 8% (n=5) and 0% of patients in the FL-guided and US-guided groups, respectively. In seven patients of the FL-guided group, intravascular contrast spread was noted during injection.ConclusionsOur results suggest that, compared with FL-guided CIESI, US-guided SNRB requires a shorter administration duration while providing similar pain relief and functional improvements.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
의과대학 > 의학과 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Park, Ki Deok photo

Park, Ki Deok
College of Medicine (Department of Medicine)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE