Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 20 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Treatment effects of ultrasound guide selective nerve root block for lower cervical radicular pain: A retrospective study of 1-year follow-up

Authors
Park, Y.Ahn, J.K.Sohn, Y.Jee, H.Lee, J.H.Kim, J.Park, K.D.
Issue Date
Oct-2013
Publisher
대한재활의학회
Keywords
Cervical radiculopathy; Fluoroscopy; Nerve block; Ultrasonography
Citation
Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, v.37, no.5, pp.658 - 667
Journal Title
Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine
Volume
37
Number
5
Start Page
658
End Page
667
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/gachon/handle/2020.sw.gachon/14963
DOI
10.5535/arm.2013.37.5.658
ISSN
2234-0645
Abstract
Objective: To compare the long-term effects and advantages of ultrasound (US)-guided selective cervical nerve root block with fluoroscopy (FL)-guided transforaminal block. Methods: From March 2009 to November 2012, 162 patients received steroid injections for lower cervical radicular pain. A total of 114 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. All procedures were performed by using US or FL. We compared the intravascular injections during the procedure with the effects and functional scales at 3, 6, and 12 months after the procedure between the two groups. Successful treatments occurred when patients obtained significant pain reliefs (as measured by >50% improvements in the verbal numerical scale [VNS] score and >40% improvements in the neck disability index [NDI] score) and reported a patient satisfaction score of 3 or 4 points at 12 months after the injection. Image analysis of intravascular injection and chart review were performed. Logistic regression was performed to reveal the correlations between successful treatments and variables (patient's age, gender, duration of the disease, cause, injection method, and radiologic finding). Results: The VNS and NDI improved 3 months after the injection and continued to improve until 12 months for both groups. But there were no statistical differences in changes of VNS, NDI, and effectiveness between these two groups. The proportion of patients with successful treatment is illustrated as 62.5% in US-guided group and 58% in FL-guided group at 12 months. There were no significant differences between the groups or during follow-up periods. Three cases of the intravascular injections were done in FL-guided group. Conclusion: The US-guided selective cervical nerve root blocks are facilitated by identifying critical vessels at unexpected locations relative to the foramen and to protect injury to such vessels, which is the leading cause of reported complications from FL-guided transforaminal blocks. On treatment effect, significant long-term improvements in functions and pain reliefs were observed in both groups after the intervention. However, significant differences were not observed between the groups. Therefore, the US-guided selective cervical nerve root block was shown to be as effective as the FL-guided transforaminal block in pain reliefs and functional improvements, in addition to the absence of radiation and protection vessel injury at real-time imaging. © 2013 by Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
의과대학 > 의학과 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Park, Ki Deok photo

Park, Ki Deok
College of Medicine (Department of Medicine)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE