Detailed Information

Cited 29 time in webofscience Cited 36 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Versus Open Lumbar Microdiscectomy: A Comparative Cohort Study with a 5-Year Follow-Up

Authors
Ahn, YongLee, Sang GuSon, SeongKeum, Han Joong
Issue Date
May-2019
Publisher
AM SOC INTERVENTIONAL PAIN PHYSICIANS
Keywords
Endoscopic; discectomy; hospital stay; lumbar disc; microscopic; operative time; return to work; transforaminal
Citation
PAIN PHYSICIAN, v.22, no.3, pp.295 - 304
Journal Title
PAIN PHYSICIAN
Volume
22
Number
3
Start Page
295
End Page
304
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/gachon/handle/2020.sw.gachon/1557
ISSN
1533-3159
Abstract
Background: Transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy (TELD) is regarded as an effective treatment option for soft lumbar disc herniation (LDH). There have been few studies evaluating the long-term outcomes of endoscopic procedures compared with conventional surgery. Objectives: The objective of this study was to demonstrate the clinical outcomes of TELD compared with those of open lumbar microdiscectomy. Study Design: Between January 2009 and September 2011, 335 consecutive patients with symptomatic LDH were treated with decompressive discectomy, either TELD or open microdiscectomy. Patients were prospectively entered into the clinical database and their records were retrospectively reviewed. Setting: Hospital and outpatient surgical center. Methods: Data from 298 patients who were treated with decompressive discectomy, either TELD or open microdiscectomy, were evaluated with a minimum 5-year follow-up period. Among them, 146 patients were treated using TELD (TELD group), and the remaining 152 patients using open microdiscectomy (Open group). Perioperative data and clinical outcomes were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and the modified Macnab criteria. Results: The VAS and ODI significantly improved in both groups. The rate of excellent or good outcomes was 88.36% and 87.5% in the TELD and Open group, respectively. The reoperation rate was 4.2% and 3.3% in the TELD and Open group, respectively. There were no significant differences in the clinical outcomes; however, operative time, hospital stay, and time to return to work were significantly shorter in the TELD group (P < 0.01). Limitations: First, the patient selection was not randomized; therefore, the risk of bias might be increased. Second, this study lacks analysis of the radiographic changes related to the degenerative change over the long-term follow-up period. Conclusions: The long-term results of TELD for soft LDH are comparable to those of conventional open microdiscectomy. The selective endoscopic discectomy technique under local anesthesia provides the typical advantages of minimally invasive procedures such as a shorter operation time, hospital stay, and recovery time.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
의과대학 > 의학과 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Son, Seong photo

Son, Seong
College of Medicine (Department of Medicine)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE