Detailed Information

Cited 117 time in webofscience Cited 113 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Sorafenib with or without concurrent transarterial chemoembolization in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: The phase III STAH trial

Authors
Park, Joong-WonKim, Yoon JunKim, Do YoungBae, Si-HyunPaik, Seung WoonLee, Youn-JaeKim, Hwi YoungLee, Han ChuHan, Sang YoungCheong, Jae YounKwon, Oh SangYeon, Jong EunKim, Bo HyunHwang, Jaeseok
Issue Date
Apr-2019
Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
Keywords
Hepatocellular carcinoma; Sorafenib; Transarterial chemoembolization; Combination treatment
Citation
JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, v.70, no.4, pp.684 - 691
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY
Volume
70
Number
4
Start Page
684
End Page
691
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/gachon/handle/2020.sw.gachon/1608
DOI
10.1016/j.jhep.2018.11.029
ISSN
0168-8278
Abstract
Background & Aims: Sorafenib is first-line standard of care for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), yet it confers limited survival benefit. Therefore, we aimed to compare clinical outcomes of sorafenib combined with concurrent conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) vs. sorafenib alone in patients with advanced HCC. Methods: In this investigator-initiated, multicenter, phase III trial, patients were randomized to receive sorafenib alone (Arm S, n = 169) or in combination with cTACE on demand (Arm C, n = 170). Sorafenib was started within 3 days and cTACE within 7-21 days of randomization. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Results: For Arms C and S, the median OS was 12.8 vs. 10.8 months (hazard ratio [HR] 0.91; 90% CI 0.69-1.21; p = 0.290); median time to progression, 5.3 vs. 3.5 months (HR 0.67; 90% CI 0.53-0.85; p = 0.003); median progression-free survival, 5.2 vs. 3.6 months (HR 0.73; 90% CI 0.59-0.91; p = 0.01); and tumor response rate, 60.6% vs. 47.3% (p = 0.005). For Arms C and S, serious (grade = 3) adverse events occurred in 33.3% vs. 19.8% (p = 0.006) of patients and included increased alanine aminotransferase levels (20.3% vs. 3.6%), hyperbilirubinemia (11.8% vs. 3.0%), ascites (11.8% vs. 4.2%), thrombocytopenia (7.2% vs. 1.2%), anorexia (7.2% vs. 1.2%), and hand-foot skin reaction (10.5% vs. 11.4%). A post hoc subgroup analysis compared OS in Arm C patients (46.4%) receiving >= 2 cTACE sessions to Arm S patients (18.6 vs. 10.8 months; HR 0.58; 95% CI 0.40-0.82; p = 0.006). Conclusion: Compared with sorafenib alone, sorafenib combined with cTACE did not improve OS in patients with advanced HCC. However, sorafenib combined with cTACE significantly improved time to progression, progression-free survival, and tumor response rate. Sorafenib alone remains the first-line standard of care for patients with advanced HCC. Lay summary: For patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma requiring sorafenib therapy, co-administration with conventional transarterial chemoembolization did not improve overall survival compared to sorafenib alone. Therefore, sorafenib alone remains the first-line standard of care for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. (C) 2018 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
의과대학 > 의학과 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Kwon, Oh Sang photo

Kwon, Oh Sang
College of Medicine (Department of Medicine)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE