Detailed Information

Cited 10 time in webofscience Cited 11 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Lymphadenectomy increases the prognostic value of the revised 2009 FIGO staging system for endometrial cancer: A multi-center study

Authors
Kim, H. S.Kim, H. Y.Park, C. Y.Lee, J. M.Lee, J. K.Cho, C. H.Kim, S. M.Kim, J. W.
Issue Date
Mar-2012
Publisher
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
Keywords
Lymphadenectomy; The revised 2009 FIGO staging system; Endometrial cancer
Citation
EJSO, v.38, no.3, pp.230 - 237
Journal Title
EJSO
Volume
38
Number
3
Start Page
230
End Page
237
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/gachon/handle/2020.sw.gachon/16542
DOI
10.1016/j.ejso.2011.12.023
ISSN
0748-7983
Abstract
Background: We investigated whether pelvic or para-aortic lymphadenectomy increases the prognostic value of the revised 2009 FIGO staging system in patients with endometrial cancer (EC). Methods: We reviewed 786 patients with EC from six tertiary medical centers between July 1996 and June 2008. All patients were classified according to the 1988 FIGO staging system: IA (n = 234); IB (n = 270); IC (n = 109); IIA (n = 35); IIB (n = 29); IIIA (n = 37); IIIB (n = 3); IIIC (n = 69), and the revised 2009 FIGO staging system was also applied to divide them: IA (=542); IB (=125); II (n = 29); IIIA (n = 18); IIIB (n = 3); IIIC I (n = 43); IIIC2 = 26). Prognostic values between the 1988 and the revised 2009 FIGO staging systems were compared by multivariate Cox's proportional hazard analysis. Results: The 1988 FIGO stage IC, IIB, IIIA + IIIB and IIIC, and the revised 2009 FIGO stage IB, II, IIIA + IIIB and IIIC2 diseases were prognostic factors for poor PFS, whereas the 1988 FIGO stage IIB and IIIC, and the revised 2009 FIGO stage 11, + IIIB and IIIC2 diseases were unfavorable prognostic factors for OS. Although these results were similar to those in 595 patients who underwent pelvic or para-aortic lymphadenectomy, the revised 2009 FIGO stage IIIC1 disease was an additional prognostic factor for poor PFS and OS (adjusted HRs, 4.19 and 11.25; 95% CIs, 1.39-12.60 and 2.23-36.74). Conclusions: The revised 2009 FIGO staging system had a higher prognostic value than the 1988 FIGO staging system, and pelvic or para-aortic lymphadenectomy increased the prognostic value of the revised 2009 FIGO staging system for EC. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
ETC > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE