Detailed Information

Cited 15 time in webofscience Cited 18 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Abbreviated MRI with optional multiphasic CT as an alternative to full-sequence MRI: LI-RADS validation in a HCC-screening cohort

Authors
Park, So HyunKim, BohyunKim, So YeonShim, Young SupKim, Ju HyunHuh, JimiKim, Hye JinKim, Kyung WonLee, Seung Soo
Issue Date
Apr-2020
Publisher
Springer
Keywords
Hepatocellular carcinoma; Liver; Magnetic resonance imaging
Citation
European Radiology, v.30, no.4, pp.2302 - 2311
Journal Title
European Radiology
Volume
30
Number
4
Start Page
2302
End Page
2311
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/gachon/handle/2020.sw.gachon/19456
DOI
10.1007/s00330-019-06546-5
ISSN
0938-7994
Abstract
Objective: To compare the diagnostic performance of abbreviated MRI (AMRI) combined with multiphasic CT (mCT) with that of full-sequence gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI (EOB-MRI) in a hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)-screening cohort Methods: Consecutive patients at risk of HCC who underwent EOB-MRI and mCT within 3 months for evaluation of new 0.5–3-cm hepatic observations were retrospectively recruited from 3 centers. An AMRI protocol comprising hepatobiliary phase, T2- and diffusion-weighted imaging, and dual-echo sequence was reconstituted from EOB-MRI. Two radiologists independently reviewed each observation in AMRI plus mCT (set 1) and EOB-MRI (set 2) per LI-RADS v2018. Per-lesion sensitivity, accuracy, and positive predictive value (PPV) for HCC were calculated and compared between image sets. Results: In 267 patients, 306 histologically confirmed observations (280 HCCs, 20 combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinomas, 1 cholangiocarcinoma, and 5 benignities) were assessed. Set 1 yielded higher sensitivity (96.4% vs. 92.9%, p = 0.013) and comparable accuracy (91.2% vs. 87.6%) and PPV (94.1% vs. 93.5%) to set 2 using LI-RADS category (LR)-4/5 criteria. The sets showed comparable sensitivity (66.4% vs. 70.4%), accuracy (67.7% vs. 70.6%), and PPV (97.4% vs. 96.6%) using LR-5 criteria. A similar substantial number of non-HCC malignancies were categorized as LR-4 or LR-5, as was the number of HCCs categorized as LR-M in both sets. Conclusions: AMRI combined with mCT showed diagnostic performance similar or superior to that of EOB-MRI for HCC diagnosis using LI-RADS. Therefore, mCT holds potential as a sequential examination for HCC diagnosis in AMRI-detected hepatic observation in patients at risk of HCC. Key Points: • AMRI plus multiphasic CT showed comparable accuracy (91.2%) and PPV (94.1%) to full-sequence gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI using LR-4/5 criteria. • AMRI plus multiphasic CT was significantly more sensitive than full-sequence gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI (96.4% vs. 92.9%) using LR-4/5 criteria. • Multiphasic CT is a potential sequential modality for HCC diagnosis after AMRI. © 2019, European Society of Radiology.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
의과대학 > 의학과 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Park, So Hyun photo

Park, So Hyun
College of Medicine (Department of Medicine)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE