Detailed Information

Cited 70 time in webofscience Cited 80 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Osimertinib versus Standard of Care EGFR TKI as First-Line Treatment in Patients with EGFRm Advanced NSCLC: FLAURA Asian Subset

Authors
Cho, Byoung ChulChewaskulyong, BusayamasLee, Ki HyeongDechaphunkul, AruneeSriuranpong, ViroteImamura, FumioNogami, NaoyukiKurata, TakayasuOkamoto, IsamuZhou, CaicunCheng, YingCho, Eun KyungVoon, Pei JyeLee, Jong-SeokMann, HelenSaggese, MatildeReungwetwattana, ThanyananRamalingam, Suresh S.Ohe, Yuichiro
Issue Date
Jan-2019
Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
Keywords
Osimertinib; First-line; Asian; FLAURA; NSCLC
Citation
JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, v.14, no.1, pp.99 - 106
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY
Volume
14
Number
1
Start Page
99
End Page
106
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/gachon/handle/2020.sw.gachon/2005
DOI
10.1016/j.jtho.2018.09.004
ISSN
1556-0864
Abstract
Introduction: Here we report efficacy and safety data of an Asian subset of the phase III FLAURA trial (NCT02296125), which compares osimertinib with standard of care (SoC) EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with previously untreated advanced NSCLC with tumors harboring exon 19 deletion (Ex19del)/L858R EGFR TKI-sensitizing mutations. Methods: Eligible Asian patients (enrolled at Asian sites) who were at least 18 years of age (>= 20 years in Japan) and had untreated EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC were randomized 1: 1 to receive osimertinib (80 mg, orally once daily) or an SoC EGFR TKI (gefitinib, 250 mg, or erlotinib, 150 mg, orally once daily). The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). The key secondary end points were overall survival, objective response rate, central nervous system efficacy, and safety. Results: The median PFS was 16.5 versus 11.0 months for the osimertinib and SoC EGFR TKI groups, respectively (hazard ratio = 0.54, 95% confidence interval: 0.41-0.72, p < 0.0001). The overall survival data were immature (24% maturity). The objective response rates were 80% for osimertinib and 75% for an SoC EGFR TKI. The median central nervous system PFS was not calculable for the osimertinib group and was 13.8 months for the SoC EGFR TKI group (hazard ratio = 0.55, 95% confidence interval: 0.25-1.17, p = 0.118). Fewer adverse events of grade 3 or higher (40% versus 48%) and fewer adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation (15% versus 21%) were reported with osimertinib versus with an SoC EGFR TKI, respectively. Conclusion: In this Asian population, first-line osimertinib demonstrated a clinically meaningful improvement in PFS over an SoC EGFR TKI, with a safety profile consistent with that for the overall FLAURA study population. (C) 2018 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
의과대학 > 의학과 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Cho, Eun Kyung photo

Cho, Eun Kyung
College of Medicine (Department of Medicine)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE