Detailed Information

Cited 13 time in webofscience Cited 21 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Comparative safety and effectiveness of transoral robotic surgery versus open surgery for oropharyngeal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors
Park, D.A.Lee, M.J.Kim, S.-H.Lee, S.H.
Issue Date
Apr-2020
Publisher
W.B. Saunders Ltd
Keywords
Oropharyngeal cancer; RAND; Robot-assisted neck dissection; Systematic review; TORS; Transoral robotic surgery
Citation
European Journal of Surgical Oncology
Journal Title
European Journal of Surgical Oncology
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/gachon/handle/2020.sw.gachon/2114
DOI
10.1016/j.ejso.2019.09.185
ISSN
0748-7983
Abstract
Background: Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) has recently emerged as a surgical technique for oropharyngeal cancer. We performed a systematic review to investigate the clinical safety and effectiveness of robotic surgery compared with conventional open surgery in primary oropharyngeal cancer. Methods: A literature search was conducted using the English-language databases Ovid-MEDLINE, Ovid-Embase, and the Cochrane Library, as well as local databases containing publications through July 2018. The outcomes included demographic characteristics, adverse events, and complications, as well as oncologic, functional, and surgical outcomes. Results: Nine papers (n = 574 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Disease-free survival rate was significantly higher in the TORS group than open surgery group (n = 5 studies, RR: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.24, I2 = 0%). Primary TORS compared with open surgery was associated with lower risks of free flap reconstruction (relative risk [RR]: 0.33, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.12.0.88, I2 = 6%). In subgroup analyses, the time to decannulation reconstruction (N = 2 concurrent studies, mean difference [MD]: −6.71, 95% CI: −8.40, −5.03, I2 = 78%) in the TORS group shortened by 6.7 days than open surgery group. The length of hospital stay showed significant shorter by 1.09 days in three concurrent studies (95% CI -3.49, 1.30, I2 = 72%). Conclusions: From current non-randomized studies, TORS could have advantage for disease-free survival and lowering the risk of free flap reconstruction compared to open surgery. However, due to lack of relevant studies, oncologic, functional, surgical outcomes including complications of TORS versus open surgery for oropharyngeal cancer are need to be verified with long-term follow-up comparative studies. © 2019 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
간호대학 > 간호학과 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Lee, Seon Heui photo

Lee, Seon Heui
Nursing (Dept.of Nursing)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE