Detailed Information

Cited 102 time in webofscience Cited 110 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Improving the Accuracy of Simultaneously Reconstructed Activity and Attenuation Maps Using Deep Learning

Authors
Hwang, DonghwiKim, Kyeong YunKang, Seung KwanSeo, SeonghoPaeng, Jin ChulLee, Dong SooLee, Jae Sung
Issue Date
1-Oct-2018
Publisher
SOC NUCLEAR MEDICINE INC
Keywords
deep learning; simultaneous reconstruction; crosstalk; denoising; quantification
Citation
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, v.59, no.10, pp.1624 - 1629
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Volume
59
Number
10
Start Page
1624
End Page
1629
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/gachon/handle/2020.sw.gachon/3225
DOI
10.2967/jnumed.117.202317
ISSN
0161-5505
Abstract
Simultaneous reconstruction of activity and attenuation using the maximum-likelihood reconstruction of activity and attenuation (MLAA) augmented by time-of-flight information is a promising method for PET attenuation correction. However, it still suffers from several problems, including crosstalk artifacts, slow convergence speed, and noisy attenuation maps (mu-maps). In this work, we developed deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to overcome these MLAA limitations, and we verified their feasibility using a clinical brain PET dataset. Methods: We applied the proposed method to one of the most challenging PET cases for simultaneous image reconstruction (F-18-fluorinated-N-3-fluoropropyl-2-beta-carboxymethoxy3- beta-(4-iodophenyl) nortropane [F-18-FP-CIT] PET scans with highly specific binding to striatum of the brain). Three different CNN architectures (convolutional autoencoder [CAE], Unet, and Hybrid of CAE) were designed and trained to learn a CT-derived mu-map (mu-CT) from the MLAA-generated activity distribution and mu-map (mu-MLAA). The PET/CT data of 40 patients with suspected Parkinson disease were used for 5-fold cross-validation. For the training of CNNs, 800,000 transverse PET and CT slices augmented from 32 patient datasets were used. The similarity to mu-CT of the CNNgenerated mu-maps (mu-CAE, mu-Unet, and mu-Hybrid) and mu-MLAA was compared using Dice similarity coefficients. In addition, we compared the activity concentration of specific (striatum) and nonspecific (cerebellum and occipital cortex) binding regions and the binding ratios in the striatum in the PET activity images reconstructed using those mu-maps. Results: The CNNs generated less noisy and more uniform mu-maps than the original mu-MLAA. Moreover, the air cavities and bones were better resolved in the proposed CNN outputs. In addition, the proposed deep learning approach was useful for mitigating the crosstalk problem in the MLAA reconstruction. The Hybrid network of CAE and Unet yielded the most similar mu-maps to mu-CT (Dice similarity coefficient in the whole head 5 0.79 in the bone and 0.72 in air cavities), resulting in only about a 5% error in activity and binding ratio quantification. Conclusion: The proposed deep learning approach is promising for accurate attenuation correction of activity distribution in time-of-flight PET systems.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
ETC > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE