Detailed Information

Cited 2,680 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Osimertinib in Untreated EGFR-Mutated Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Authors
Soria, J. -C.Ohe, Y.Vansteenkiste, J.Reungwetwattana, T.Chewaskulyong, B.Lee, K. H.Dechaphunkul, A.Imamura, F.Nogami, N.Kurata, T.Okamoto, I.Zhou, C.Cho, B. C.Cheng, Y.Cho, E. K.Voon, P. J.Planchard, D.Su, W. -C.Gray, J. E.Lee, S. -M.Hodge, R.Marotti, M.Rukazenkov, Y.Ramalingam, S. S.
Issue Date
11-Jan-2018
Publisher
MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SOC
Citation
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, v.378, no.2, pp.113 - 125
Journal Title
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
Volume
378
Number
2
Start Page
113
End Page
125
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/gachon/handle/2020.sw.gachon/4170
DOI
10.1056/NEJMoa1713137
ISSN
0028-4793
Abstract
BACKGROUND Osimertinib is an oral, third-generation, irreversible epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) that selectively inhibits both EGFR-TKI-sensitizing and EGFR T790M resistance mutations. We compared osimertinib with standard EGFR-TKIs in patients with previously untreated, EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS In this double-blind, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 556 patients with previously untreated, EGFR mutation-positive (exon 19 deletion or L858R) advanced NSCLC in a 1: 1 ratio to receive either osimertinib (at a dose of 80 mg once daily) or a standard EGFR-TKI (gefitinib at a dose of 250 mg once daily or erlotinib at a dose of 150 mg once daily). The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival. RESULTS The median progression-free survival was significantly longer with osimertinib than with standard EGFR-TKIs (18.9 months vs. 10.2 months; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.37 to 0.57; P<0.001). The objective response rate was similar in the two groups: 80% with osimertinib and 76% with standard EGFR-TKIs (odds ratio, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.85 to 1.90; P = 0.24). The median duration of response was 17.2 months (95% CI, 13.8 to 22.0) with osimertinib versus 8.5 months (95% CI, 7.3 to 9.8) with standard EGFR-TKIs. Data on overall survival were immature at the interim analysis (25% maturity). The survival rate at 18 months was 83% (95% CI, 78 to 87) with osimertinib and 71% (95% CI, 65 to 76) with standard EGFR-TKIs (hazard ratio for death, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.88; P = 0.007 [nonsignificant in the interim analysis]). Adverse events of grade 3 or higher were less frequent with osimertinib than with standard EGFR-TKIs (34% vs. 45%). CONCLUSIONS Osimertinib showed efficacy superior to that of standard EGFR-TKIs in the first-line treatment of EGFR mutation-positive advanced NSCLC, with a similar safety profile and lower rates of serious adverse events.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
의과대학 > 의학과 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Cho, Eun Kyung photo

Cho, Eun Kyung
College of Medicine (Department of Medicine)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE