Detailed Information

Cited 8 time in webofscience Cited 8 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Impact of Significant Mitral Regurgitation on Assessing the Severity of Aortic Stenosis

Authors
Lee, Pil HyungHong, Jung AeSun, Byung JooHan, SeungbongPark, SangwooJang, Jeong YoonKim, Dae-HeeKang, Duk-HyunSong, Jae-KwanSong, Jong-Min
Issue Date
Jan-2018
Publisher
MOSBY-ELSEVIER
Keywords
Aortic stenosis; Mitral regurgitation; Echocardiography
Citation
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, v.31, no.1, pp.26 - 33
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY
Volume
31
Number
1
Start Page
26
End Page
33
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/gachon/handle/2020.sw.gachon/4235
DOI
10.1016/j.echo.2017.09.012
ISSN
0894-7317
Abstract
Background: Significant mitral regurgitation (MR) may reduce a pressure gradient of aortic stenosis (AS) by decreasing forward stroke volume. The study objective was to evaluate whether significant MR can cause inconsistency when assessing the severity of AS. Methods: Among 5,355 patients diagnosed with AS from 2000 to 2015, 68 were retrospectively found to have concomitant significant (moderate or greater) MR and normal left ventricular ejection fractions in normal sinus rhythm (AS with MR). As a control group, 136 patients with trivial or no MR were selected who were matched by age, gender, and left ventricular end-systolic volume (AS without MR). Nonlinear regression was performed for data pairs (aortic valve area [AVA] vs mean pressure gradient [MPG]) using the formula AVA = a + b root OMPG. Composite clinical events were defined as aortic valve surgery warranted by the development of symptoms or left ventricular dysfunction, admission because of heart failure, and death. Results: The forward stroke volume index was significantly lower in the AS with MR group than in the AS without MR group (43.86 +/- 8.3 vs 49.26 +/- 10.2 mL/m(2), P <.004). A significant group difference was found with respect to the relationship between (indexed) AVA and MPG (AVA, 0.02 + 4.43/root MPG vs -0.06 + 5.60/OMPG [P for interaction =.04]; indexed AVA, 0.03 + 2.66/root MPG vs -0.03 + 3.47/OMPG [P for interaction =.01]). An AVA of 1.0 cm(2) corresponded to MPGs of 20.3 and 28.2mmHg for the groups with and without MR, respectively. Conversely, an MPG of 40mm Hg corresponded to AVAs of 0.72 and 0.83 cm(2) for the groups with and without MR, respectively. Among patients with MPGs < 40mm Hg, clinical event rates were significantly higher in those with MR compared with those without MR (P =.009). Conclusions: This quantitative analysis demonstrated that AS severity assessed by MPG measurement may be underestimated, and thus AVA measurement is essential in patients with combined significant MR.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
사회과학대학 > 응용통계학과 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE