Detailed Information

Cited 31 time in webofscience Cited 31 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Computer-aided detection of brain metastasis on 3D MR imaging: Observer performance study

Authors
Sunwoo, LeonardKim, Young JaeChoi, Seung HongKim, Kwang-GiKang, Ji HeeKang, YeonahBae, Yun JungYoo, Roh-EulKim, JihangLee, Kyong JoonLee, Seung HyunChoi, Byung SeJung, CheolkyuSohn, Chul-HoKim, Jae Hyoung
Issue Date
8-Jun-2017
Publisher
PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
Citation
PLOS ONE, v.12, no.6
Journal Title
PLOS ONE
Volume
12
Number
6
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/gachon/handle/2020.sw.gachon/5999
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0178265
ISSN
1932-6203
Abstract
Purpose To assess the effect of computer-aided detection (CAD) of brain metastasis (BM) on radiologists' diagnostic performance in interpreting three-dimensional brain magnetic resonance (MR) imaging using follow-up imaging and consensus as the reference standard. Materials and methods The institutional review board approved this retrospective study. The study cohort consisted of 110 consecutive patients with BM and 30 patients without BM. The training data set included MR images of 80 patients with 450 BM nodules. The test set included MR images of 30 patients with 134 BM nodules and 30 patients without BM. We developed a CAD system for BM detection using template-matching and K-means clustering algorithms for candidate detection and an artificial neural network for false-positive reduction. Four reviewers (two neuroradiologists and two radiology residents) interpreted the test set images before and after the use of CAD in a sequential manner. The sensitivity, false positive (FP) per case, and reading time were analyzed. A jackknife free-response receiver operating characteristic (JAFROC) method was used to determine the improvement in the diagnostic accuracy. Results he sensitivity of CAD was 87.3% with an FP per case of 302.4. CAD significantly improved the diagnostic performance of the four reviewers with a figure-of-merit (FOM) of 0.874 (without CAD) vs. 0.898 (with CAD) according to JAFROC analysis (p < 0.01). Statistically significant improvement was noted only for less-experienced reviewers (FOM without vs. with CAD, 0.834 vs. 0.877, p < 0.01). The additional time required to review the CAD results was approximately 72 sec (40% of the total review time). Conclusion CAD as a second reader helps radiologists improve their diagnostic performance in the detection of BM on MR imaging, particularly for less-experienced reviewers.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
보건과학대학 > 의용생체공학과 > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Kim, Young Jae photo

Kim, Young Jae
IT (의공학과)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE