Ultrasound versus fluoroscopy-guided cervical medial branch block for the treatment of chronic cervical facet joint pain: a retrospective comparative study
- Authors
- Park, Ki Deok; Lim, Dong-Ju; Lee, Woo Yong; Ahn, JaeKi; Park, Yongbum
- Issue Date
- Jan-2017
- Publisher
- SPRINGER
- Keywords
- Cervical facet joint pain; Ultrasound; Fluoroscopy; Medial branch block
- Citation
- SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, v.46, no.1, pp.81 - 91
- Journal Title
- SKELETAL RADIOLOGY
- Volume
- 46
- Number
- 1
- Start Page
- 81
- End Page
- 91
- URI
- https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/gachon/handle/2020.sw.gachon/6506
- DOI
- 10.1007/s00256-016-2516-2
- ISSN
- 0364-2348
- Abstract
- To compare the mid-term effects and advantages of the ultrasound (US)-guided with fluoroscopy(FL)-guided cervical medial branch blocks (CMBBs) for chronic cervical facet joint pain through assessment of pain relief, functional improvement, and injection efficiency. Patients with chronic cervical facet joint pain who received US- (n = 68) or FL-guided CMBBs (n = 58) were included in this retrospective study. All procedures were performed using a FL or US. The complication frequencies, treatment effects, functional improvement, and injection efficiency of CMBBs were compared at 1, 3, and 6 months after the last injection. Both the NDI and VNS scores showed improvements at 1, 3, and 6 months after the last injection in both groups, with no significant differences between groups (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the treatment success rate at all time points was not significantly different between groups. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the injection method (US- or FL-guided), the number of injections, sex, analgesic use, and age were not independent predictors of treatment success. Compared with FL-guided CMBB, US-guided CMBB was associated with a shorter administration duration and fewer needle passes. Our results suggest that, compared with FL-guided CMBBs, US-guided CMBBs require a shorter administration duration and fewer needle passes, while providing similar pain relief and functional improvements. Therefore, US-guided CMBBs can be considered as an effective alternative for the conservative management of chronic cervical facet joint pain.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - 의과대학 > 의학과 > 1. Journal Articles
![qrcode](https://api.qrserver.com/v1/create-qr-code/?size=55x55&data=https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/gachon/handle/2020.sw.gachon/6506)
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.