Detailed Information

Cited 5 time in webofscience Cited 6 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Intraoperative Motor-Evoked Potential Disappearance versus Amplitude-Decrement Alarm Criteria During Cervical Spinal Surgery: A Long-Term Prognosis

Authors
Kim, Dong-GunChoi, Young-DooJin, Seung-HyunKim, Chi HeonLee, Kwang-WooPark, Kyung SeokChung, Chun KeeKim, Sung-Min
Issue Date
Jan-2017
Publisher
KOREAN NEUROLOGICAL ASSOC
Keywords
cervical spinal surgery; long-term prognosis; motor deficit; alarm criteria; motor-evoked potential; intraoperative monitoring
Citation
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROLOGY, v.13, no.1, pp.38 - 46
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Volume
13
Number
1
Start Page
38
End Page
46
URI
https://scholarworks.bwise.kr/gachon/handle/2020.sw.gachon/6568
DOI
10.3988/jcn.2017.13.1.38
ISSN
1738-6586
Abstract
Background and Purpose We studied the clinical significance of amplitude-reduction and disappearance alarm criteria for transcranial electric muscle motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) during cervical spinal surgery according to different lesion locations [intramedullary (IM) vs. nonintramedullary (NIM)] by evaluating the long-term postoperative motor status. Methods In total, 723 patients were retrospectively dichotomized into the IM and NIM groups. Each limb was analyzed respectively. One hundred and sixteen limbs from 30 patients with IM tumors and 2,761 limbs from 693 patients without IM tumors were enrolled. Postoperative motor deficits were assessed up to 6 months after surgery. Results At the end of surgery, 61 limbs (2.2%) in the NIM group and 14 limbs (12.1%) in the IM group showed MEP amplitudes that had decreased to below 50% of baseline, with 13 of the NIM limbs (21.3%) and 2 of the IM limbs (14.3%) showing MEP disappearance. Thirteen NIM limbs (0.5%) and 5 IM limbs (4.3%) showed postoperative motor deficits. The criterion for disappearance showed a lower sensitivity for the immediate motor deficit than did the criterion for amplitude decrement in both the IM and NIM groups. However, the disappearance criterion showed the same sensitivity as the 70%-decrement criterion in IM (100%) and NIM (83%) surgeries for the motor deficit at 6 months after surgery. Moreover, it has the highest specificity for the motor deficits among diverse alarm criteria, from 24 hours to 6 months after surgery, in both the IM and NIM groups. Conclusions The MEP disappearance alarm criterion had a high specificity in predicting the long-term prognosis after cervical spinal surgery. However, because it can have a low sensitivity in predicting an immediate postoperative deficit, combining different MEP alarm criteria according to the aim of specific instances of cervical spinal surgery is likely to be useful in practical intraoperative monitoring.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
ETC > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE